Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OESY

Note the insidious naming of Scooter Libby in this editorial too. Pretty obvious who the Slimes' target is here.


3 posted on 09/27/2004 6:18:54 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Proud to be a Reagan Alumna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dems_R_Losers
But other journalists have acknowledged getting subpoenas and some have testified about their contacts with I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff. They say they did so based on his consent, but consent granted by government employees under a threat of dismissal hardly seems voluntary.

This is outrageous.

Libby waived any confidentiality and the Times is in a snit?!

Notice how they omit the part where the reporters who testified have said that Libby never brought up, nor did they, Wilson or his wife.

What do they mean that his consenting that reporters be allowed to testify to conversations they had with Libby doesn't seem voluntary. What does that mean??? It means nothing. They are just stringing words together in order to convey a deceitful message.

They are sick.

23 posted on 09/27/2004 6:49:54 AM PDT by cyncooper (Have I mentioned lately that I despise the media?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson