More BS from the New York Times.
Does anyone actually read this article beyond the second paragraph?
I gave up reading the New York Times years ago simply because I was unable to.
actually, this was pretty scathing for the NYTimes....
the theme is that he doe not do ONE THING without calling someone and asking for their opinion or looking for more information (always doubts). He does not command loyalty, nor does it seem, respect.
"As a result, while some stalwarts from Mr. Kerry's first campaign have stuck with him since 1972, the senior staff of his campaign includes few people who call themselves his friends or are personally loyal to him."
I souldn't. How did it end? Did the reporter get on his knees for Kerry?