Sorry for vanishing for a bit ping.
I'll take it. I'm not to sure about Iowa but, otherwise, this looks to me like how it will shake out, barring any major events.
Hon....that's okay. But we missed you!
Glad you're back!
GEORGE W. BUSH 2004!!!!!
BUSH/CHENEY 2004!
Finally...I thought you'd been kidnapped by aliens.
Could you please add me to your ping list? Also, in your MI box you have the numbers switched on one poll; it should be K53-B42. Not trying to nitpick, but just so no one gets confused.
Oh, THANK you! I felt like I was starving for your analysis... every time new poll numbers came out, all I could think was, "Yeah, but what would Dales say about it???" :-)
BTW, did you see that you have a spectacular Weblog ranking?
36) Daly Thoughts & Dales' Electoral College Breakdown 2004 12673 visits/day (3127)
http://www.truthlaidbear.com/TrafficRanking.php
Superb work as usual. Until tonight, I never know that there was little or no historical evidence to support the urban myth that debates materially affect Presidential campaigns -- with the 1980 exception, of course. Actually, my belief is that debates tend to consolidate support for each candidate, and change very few minds.