Posted on 09/26/2004 3:09:48 PM PDT by thierrya
Cyprus Minister Says Chechens Being Trained In North To Strike Russia
NICOSIA, Sept 26 (AFP) - Cypriot Justice Minister Doros Theodorou said in remarks published on Sunday that Chechen terrorists were being trained in the Turkish-held part of the divided Mediterranean island to strike Russian targets.
The charges were carried in an interview with the mass circulation Phileleftheros newspaper.
"There are Chechens and other terrorist groups over there (north) being trained," Theodorou was quoted by Phileleftheros.
"But we are mainly talking about Chechens who are trained to hit predominantly Russian targets," he said.
Earlier this month after the Breslan school massacre in southern Russia, a Greek Cypriot government spokesman denied that the authorities had any hard evidence of terrorist activity in the Turkish-held part of the island.
Theodorou insisted that the intellingence reports received by the internationally-recognised Greek Cypriot government were trustworthy.
He said he would suggest that the government make known the terrorist threat in the north to the international community, especially the European Union and the United States.
Both Brussels and Washington are seen as sympathetic to the Turkish Cypriot cause since Greek Cypriots rejected an UN peace plan at a referendum in April.
"Our side must establish what illegalities are going on and make the accusations at every level," said Theodorou.
"Our information is clean and from credible sources and we have every reason to trust them," he added.
"His non-Greek comment, refers to the fact that the histories of Balkans peoples are seldom accepted by their neighbors. Take Macedonia for example, they say that they are descendants of the ancient Macedonians, the Greeks say that the ancinent Macedonians were Hellenistic and the Macedonians are largely Bulgarians and slavicized Greeks."
Well aren't the modern Macedonians Slavs? The Slavs didn't come to the Balkans until about the 6th or 7th century, if I'm not mistaken.
"As far as Albania's hisory, the mainstream version is not accepted by certain other Balkan nations."
Are you referring to the notion that the Albanians are descended from the Dacians or the Thracians? The ALbanian and ROmanian languages do have a good deal of similarities, despite occuping different language family branches of Indo-European. However, the original Romanians/Vlachs probably originated from the S and Central Serbian/Northern Macedonian/NW BUlgarian and NE Albanian area. By the way, I'm sorry about the tagline from my previous post.
>>>Are you referring to the notion that the Albanians are descended from the Dacians or the Thracians? The ALbanian and ROmanian languages do have a good deal of similarities, despite occuping different language family branches of Indo-European. However, the original Romanians/Vlachs probably originated from the S and Central Serbian/Northern Macedonian/NW BUlgarian and NE Albanian area. By the way, I'm sorry about the tagline from my previous post.
Well, the mainstream theories have them descending from either Illyrians or Thracians, or some type of mixture of the two. However many Serb and Macedonian historians and certain Greek historians, completely put aside this notion and claim that the Albanians didn't come into the Balkans until the 15th century from the Caucasus, and they cite Caucasian Albania as proof.
The following paper discusses (among other things) the apparent similarities between Albanian and Romanian.
http://members.tripod.com/~Groznijat/balkan/ehamp.html
However further than that I have to plead ignorance for etymology/linguistics is only a hobby for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.