What would be the consequences of having another Democratic Administration?

Please give me your thoughts and critisms.

1 posted on 09/26/2004 6:26:33 AM PDT by HankReardon

I typed this with paragraghs, I don't know what happened, sorry. Try to keep your eyes uncrossed.

2 posted on 09/26/2004 6:29:32 AM PDT by HankReardon

In HTML, you need to break up paragraphs with < br > (no spaces) typed between them.

-Dan

3 posted on 09/26/2004 6:32:01 AM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Strange Things Are Afoot at the Circle K.)

To: Flux Capacitor

yep, tried. Is that your comment? What about the content?

4 posted on 09/26/2004 6:34:42 AM PDT by HankReardon

Please give me your thoughts and critisms.

Sit up straight and for Gods sake put a clean shirt on.

5 posted on 09/26/2004 6:36:58 AM PDT by bad company (What's the font kenneth?)

I was among the 19% that voted for Ross Perot in '92, my vote otherwise would have been a Bush vote. At work the day after the election a young liberal co-worker asked my what terrible things did I think was going to happen just because Bill Clinton was president. All I could say was he seemed disingenious to me, untrustworthy, a people pleaser.

Now in hindsight I know the answer. The military and intelligence agencies was under assault right away with downsizing of funds and personnel. Political leanings took precedence over ability and experience at high ranking positions. "Clinton thinking" people were installed. The greatest health care system in the world quickly came under assault with an attempt nationalize, govermnent fund the system.

When the Republicans gained control in Congress in '94 Clinton was so concerned about his re-election chances that millions of dollars were illegally accepted from our enemies, the Communist Chinese military. This money moved from the PLA, to the Chinese Lippo Group in the Philippines, to the Democratic National Committee then to the Clinton/Gore campaign. It would be difficult to list all of what the Chinese bought with this money. In order for American companies to transfer civilian nuclear technology to another nation the President must first declare the nation a non-miltary threat and as not a threat for proliferation. No president was confident to do this concerning Communist China until Bill Clinton, he did.

He also eased trade restrictions concerning other sensitive technologies. Even with this, another large Clinton/ Gore contributor, Loral Space was fined $14 million was illegally selling sensitive technologies to our enemy. It is estimated that China's nuclear and space program advanced decades ahead than it otherwise would have. The regime in North Korea are oppressive murderers, torturers and lying communists. The Clinton administration knowing all this in order to look as if they were achieving accomplishments pretended they were honest people and would not violate a treaty. The NK's were paid for their promise to dis-continue trying to develop nuclear weapons. They are now a suspected military nuclear power.

An American citizen, Paula Jones was denied Justice by a sitting American President. Perjury was committed and then he used his power to try to cover this up. Crimes were committed, witness tampering, obstruction of Justice, Abuse of Power .... Many life long Democrats dishonored themselves, their families, their constituents, their country by public acclaiming the perpetration of these crimes by a sitting American President against an American citizen was simply a part of President Clinton's personnel life. President Clinton was on a perpetual campaign while in office, he was poll driven.

After re-election he acted to enhance how history would portray him, building a legacy. He vetoed Welfare reform twice, only when the polls showed the people were in favor of this did he sign the Bill. President Clinton was the corrupt CEO of the Federal Government. Just as many corporations had to readjust their numbers after the departure of their corrupt CEO's the Federal Government also did this in August of 2001.

It seems while the economy was slowing and heading toward recesion during the 2000 election inaccurate numbers from the government hid this fact from the electorate. The United States and it's interests around the world were under attack all through the Clinton Administration. Many incidents demonstrate his lack of political courage in substaining military casualties. Haitti, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosivo, the lack of a sufficient miltary response against Al Qaeda. Iraq was continuously in violation of the Cease Fire Treaty of '91. The "Gorelick Wall" was put in place which forbid the CIA and the FBI from sharing information.

The United Staes was attacked less than 8 months into the following, over 3,000 innocent civilians died here in America because Bill Clinton was President. There has to be so much more of the consequences from having a Democratic Administration that I am leaving out. This is a long enough read anyway. It is proper and right that now we all speculate and consider what will be the consequences of having a Democratic Administrtion beginning in January 2005.

My prediction is that we lose at least one major metropolitan area. This may happen anyway becaue of the recklessness of the Clinton 8 years but would be less likely to happen with a Democrat NOT in the Oval Office. A strong prediction? For me to answer my co-worker in November of '92 with the facts we now know would have also been a strong prediction.

6 posted on 09/26/2004 6:37:59 AM PDT by buffyt (You don't create terrorists by fighting back. You defeat the terrorists by fighting back. ~GWBush~)

Please give me your thoughts and critisms.

You voted for Ross Perot, and you spelled 'criticisms' wrong.

;^)

5.56mmz

7 posted on 09/26/2004 6:38:18 AM PDT by M Kehoe

Not to panic anyone, but a Kerry Administration would more or less be The End Of The World As We Know It.

8 posted on 09/26/2004 6:39:04 AM PDT by Constantine XIII

OK, where did that 'z' come from?

Sheesh.

5.56mm

9 posted on 09/26/2004 6:39:13 AM PDT by M Kehoe

Anyway, kicking George Bush out of office this year would ultimately mean the end of this country. And that isn't hyperbole, either. The Islamofascists based ten years of dirty work on Clinton's response to Mogadishu; he gave them no reason to think the U.S. wouldn't blink in subsequent conflicts, and indeed he ignored the terror threat for the rest of his administration.

Imagine the message it would send to the rest of the world if our current president, the man who finally decided the U.S. had had enough of this s--t and has committed us to WIPING OUT the Islamofascists, were rejected by the American people in his re-election bid. We, as a country, would never be taken seriously again. We would never again be counted on to step up and defend the free world. The Islamists would feel free to attack us with impunity, not only because, against a Democratic administration, they WOULD be free to do so, but because America will have confirmed forever that terrorism WORKS.

-Dan

10 posted on 09/26/2004 6:42:28 AM PDT by Flux Capacitor (Strange Things Are Afoot at the Circle K.)

Thank you! I'll remember to do that!

11 posted on 09/26/2004 6:42:36 AM PDT by HankReardon

"My prediction is that we lose at least one major metropolitan area."

I agree.

ONE: Our reaction to 9-11, in certain respects, is too PC and too half-hearted.

TWO:The Psycho's we are dealing with are---well---psycho's. In their minds they enter History and Immortality by, say, takeing out NY or some such city. They have the will they need only the way.

It is much harder to do such a thing than most people think and such a huge crime is often 'ratted out' by some one a shade less committed then his fellows. But I believe the "stuff" is out there in the world some where and it only need be brought here for the deal to be done.

Bottom line: we have left too many of these psychos alive too long after 9-11.

12 posted on 09/26/2004 6:44:14 AM PDT by TalBlack

How's this:

I was among the 19% that voted for Ross Perot in '92, my vote otherwise would have been a Bush vote.

At work the day after the election a young liberal co-worker asked me what terrible things did I think was going to happen just because Bill Clinton was president. All I could say was he seemed disingenuous to me, untrustworthy, a people pleaser. Now in hindsight I know the answer. The military and intelligence agencies were under assault right away with downsizing of funds and personnel. Political leanings took precedence over ability and experience at high ranking positions. "Clinton thinking" people were installed. The greatest health care system in the world quickly came under assault with an attempt nationalize, government fund the system.

In order for American companies to transfer civilian nuclear technology to another nation the President must first declare the nation a non-miltary threat and as not a threat for proliferation. No president was confident to do this concerning Communist China until Bill Clinton, he did. He also eased trade restrictions concerning other sensitive technologies. Even with this, another large Clinton/ Gore contributor, Loral Space was fined $14 million was illegally selling sensitive technologies to our enemy. It is estimated that China's nuclear and space program advanced decades ahead than it otherwise would have.

The regime in North Korea are oppressive murderers, torturers and lying communists. The Clinton administration knowing all this in order to look as if they were achieving accomplishments pretended they were honest people and would not violate a treaty. The NK's were paid for their promise to discontinue trying to develop nuclear weapons. They are now a suspected military nuclear power.

President Clinton was on a perpetual campaign while in office, he was poll driven. After re-election he acted to enhance how history would portray him, building a legacy. He vetoed Welfare reform twice, only when the polls showed the people were in favor of this did he sign the Bill.

President Clinton was the corrupt CEO of the Federal Government. Just as many corporations had to readjust their numbers after the departure of their corrupt CEO's the Federal Government also did this in August of 2001. It seems while the economy was slowing and heading toward recession during the 2000 election inaccurate numbers from the government hid this fact from the electorate.

The United States and its interests around the world were under attack all through the Clinton Administration. Many incidents demonstrate his lack of political courage in sustaining military casualties: Haiti, Somalia, Bosnia, Kosovo, the lack of a sufficient military response against Al Qaeda. Iraq was continuously in violation of the Cease Fire Treaty of '91. The "Gorelick Wall" was put in place which forbade the CIA and the FBI from sharing information. The United States was attacked less than 8 months into the following, over 3,000 innocent civilians died here in America because Bill Clinton was President.

There has to be so much more of the consequences from having a Democratic Administration that I am leaving out. This is a long enough read anyway.

It is proper and right that now we all speculate and consider what will be the consequences of having a Democratic Administrtion beginning in January 2005. My prediction is that we lose at least one major metropolitan area. This may happen anyway because of the recklessness of the Clinton 8 years but would be less likely to happen with a Democrat NOT in the Oval Office. A strong prediction? For me to answer my co-worker in November of '92 with the facts we now know would have also been a strong prediction.

13 posted on 09/26/2004 6:45:04 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)

ah. Took me too long. :)

14 posted on 09/26/2004 6:45:54 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)