Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen, Bush 48 Kerry 46, Daily delta +1
rasmussenreports.com ^ | Sept 25, 2004 | Rasmussen

Posted on 09/25/2004 9:05:12 AM PDT by Owen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: blogblogginaway

He may have released it only to his premium members, of whom I am not one.


21 posted on 09/25/2004 11:09:07 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Owen

I am a premium member and there is no poll on Nevada as Rasmussen stated there would be yesterday. Like I said, this is not the first time they said they would post a certain battle ground state and didn't. I may have to ask for my 'premium' money back.


22 posted on 09/25/2004 11:34:11 AM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Owen

I wouldnt be concenred about anything in this poll.

It has officially been declared useless. There is obviously some smoothing done to ensure neither candidate gets a large lead.


as we approach the election I will be following TRADESPORTS, Iowa Electronic Markets and Gallup.


I predict Scott will be out of the polling business on Nov 3rd.


23 posted on 09/25/2004 11:37:17 AM PDT by OhGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasotarepublican

"the White House refusing to answer the National Guard story has clearly cut into the Bush lead."

I think that is nonesense. Bush's big double digit lead was bound to shrink the further we got from the convention.

The only story in the National Guard story is how deep the rot is at CBS. It was exposed in a way that media bias never has been before. Even NBC was all over it.


24 posted on 09/25/2004 11:40:20 AM PDT by OhGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2
Agree.

Look, the biggest unspoken reality of this campaign is that WHEN Bush wins he will HAVE to do something about Iran, and that means boom boom boom.

25 posted on 09/25/2004 12:10:15 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mywholebodyisaweapon
Well, several here pointed out that both Time and Newsweek polled significantly higher Republicans in their post Republican convention poll than they did in other polls.

Polls used to be good for spotting trends. Whether a poll was skewed to Republicans or Democrats, you could judge whether a candidate was rising or falling by tracking the same poll. With pollsters changing their methodology during the same election cycles, many of the polls become garbage, like the Time and Newsweek polls.

The best thing to watch is what the candidates are doing and where they're campaigning. Kerry is in serious trouble, as he's dropped campaigning in the old Bush "battleground" states, and has started ads in the old Gore "battleground" states. The Kerry campaign is in serious disarray. New advisors this late in the game aren't good. Also, although some disagree with me, the fact that Kerry is pitching to his base again indicates he's got serious base problems. Some claim that base turnout will sway the election, and I understand this point, but I disagree with the premise. A candidate should not have to be whipping up his base after the convention.

Kerry is hurting badly. In the democrat party, though, the true believers are fanatics. They will commit any fraud necessary to win. We must push Bush's totals high enough that fraud is not an option. Hopefully, we can demoralize the Rats enough that they will stay away from the polls and allow downticket Republicans to pick up some perecentage points.

26 posted on 09/25/2004 12:25:15 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (Kerry Campaign: An army of pompous phrases moving across the landscape in search of an idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LS

Overall, I think Bush has been okay on Saddam being a terrorist and state supporter of terrorism, and on the WMD issue. He has been better than okay at exposing the mess of inconsistencies, contradictories, and incoherence in Kerry's positions on Iraq and other aspects of the war on terror. This is why virtually every major poll gives Bush hugh leads on national security and leadership questions.

I would like to see Bush follow up on the recent FNC stories on the Oil for Food scandal, incuding especially how Saddam used the program to get money to businesses and individuals known to be funders of Al Queada. This is potential roadkill material for him.

Also, I would like to see the US military flatten the terrorists in Fallujah once and for all, with extreme prejudice.

Last, I would like to see Bush challenge Kerry on who he is actually rooting for in Iraq: Saddam, Zarqawi, or Allawi -- and then challenge him to apologize to Allawi.

Fortunately, Kerry is so bad that Bush doens't have to be at the top of his game to win. However, I would love to see him run up the score so badly that the Democrats will never again dare to nominate as leftist and anti-American a candidate as Kerry. He is a complete disgrace, even by Rat standards.


27 posted on 09/25/2004 1:38:49 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tomnbeverly
The slip is probably due to the fear of the draft that Kerry campaign is trying to entice young voters with... That is why I think it is imperative that FOX do a special report about the draft...

God, no! This is something that Bush himself should raise during the debate. It will be much more effective that way.

28 posted on 09/25/2004 1:40:37 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
It seems if the avg. polling results (real clear politics) is showing a lead of 5 or more for Bush in a toss up state, Rasmussen delays polling and putting that state's electoral votes in the Bush column.

The guys at realclearpolitics are terrific. I would put much more stock in them than in Rasmussen. However, Rasmussen did mention in today's column that Bush is tied or leading in every state in which the lead is less than five points -- states reflecting 117 EVs on top of the 200 or so he already had in the Bush column. This finding is in line with most of the other electoral college maps that I have seen.

29 posted on 09/25/2004 1:43:20 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LS
What is hurting Bush is the violence in Iraq, which we all knew could be a problem, and which the terrorists are counting on being a problem.

I am unaware of any polling evidence that the violence in Iraq is actually hurting Bush. In virtually every major poll this week on the subject, solid majorities say that things are not going well there but that Bush is the best man to deal with the problems. They're right.

30 posted on 09/25/2004 1:45:41 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
I am a premium member and there is no poll on Nevada as Rasmussen stated there would be yesterday. Like I said, this is not the first time they said they would post a certain battle ground state and didn't. I may have to ask for my 'premium' money back.

Four years ago, I was too. Once bitten, twice shy. Gallup came out with a Nevada poll earlier this week showing Bush ahead by about nine points, IIRC. Mason Dixon came out with a poll last week showing Bush ahead by five. It doesn't get any better than these two firms as far as I'm concerned.

31 posted on 09/25/2004 1:48:41 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude

I was certain Bush would be below Kerry today. My last three days are 46.7/45.1/51.9 Bush and 47.5/46.1/45.3 Kerry. Bush need today's polling numbers bigtime. It should keep him safe through the weekend.


32 posted on 09/25/2004 2:40:53 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Heads up, folks. There is another thread running that describes how the Dems are out-registering the GOP. They are signing up new voters in larger numbers than we are.

What this means is actions that appear weak, i.e., solidifying the base this late in the campaign, Is Not Weak. It is intended to energize those new registrants and raise the % of them that show up to vote.

They have increase their pool of available voters and now they are getting them committed to showing up.

Read the thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1226947/posts?page=15

and then please, please call the campaign and volunteer ASAP. We only have about a week before we're past the registration deadline for most states. We have to move NOW.


33 posted on 09/25/2004 2:45:32 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Nascardude
Isn't a national poll highly subject to distortion, and flucuation? How can several hundred samples (if it is that large) accurately reflect a nation of nearly 300 million people?

I would much rather rely upon statewide polls that reflect local preferences and trends. Aren't they more telling?

34 posted on 09/25/2004 2:53:38 PM PDT by FLCowboy, (Hillary is still waiting in the wings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KJacob

The Dimocraps have already pulled their ads in W. Virginia, not a good sign.


35 posted on 10/23/2004 10:42:45 AM PDT by attiladhun2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2
The mentally ill ugly little tyrant
I thought, at first, you were refering to Jimmy Carter, but you mean Carter's good buddy in N. Korea, don't you?
36 posted on 10/23/2004 10:47:17 AM PDT by attiladhun2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson