Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Pet Cause for the Very Rich: Swaying the Election
NY Times ^ | September 25, 2004 | GLEN JUSTICE

Posted on 09/24/2004 10:42:20 PM PDT by Former Military Chick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Sometimes I find myself angered by the fatcats and the fact that I do not have the thousands to drop into the hat.

It almost makes it out of reach for so many folks. Granted the fatcats help us in the end, but, I don't know about you but I sure would like to attend these fundraises.

1 posted on 09/24/2004 10:42:20 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Alternate title:
Rich Liberals Squander Their Fortunes on Guaranteed Losers.
2 posted on 09/24/2004 10:47:33 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Sway the election-- VOTE BUSH!
3 posted on 09/24/2004 10:48:29 PM PDT by fat city (Julius Rosenberg's soviet code name was "Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
I'm not mad at the "fatcats" on this, I'm mad at the political establishment for infringing on my freedom of speech (yes that includes the President). The only people who get any political traction now are the very rich. If the old system was flawed, I couldn't tell. The McCain-Feingold Act should be renamed the Incumbent Protection Act. And to make matters worse, the MSM are complicit because they saw how much more influence this would allow them in the elections.
4 posted on 09/24/2004 10:51:14 PM PDT by Stonedog (Mr. Blather... tear down this STONEWALL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch; Former Military Chick
Alternate title:
Rich Liberals Squander Their Fortunes on Guaranteed Losers.

2nd Alternate title:
Rich Liberals Practice Income Redistribution.

5 posted on 09/24/2004 10:53:15 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Hey, Susie... send me $100

I promise you won't regret it !!!

Thanks, Sweetie


6 posted on 09/24/2004 10:57:11 PM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

3rd Alternate title:
What a bunch of morons.


7 posted on 09/24/2004 10:59:02 PM PDT by philetus (Zell Miller - One of the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stonedog

Well said.


8 posted on 09/24/2004 10:59:53 PM PDT by hyperpoly8 (Illegitimati Non Carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Of course, I may just be hopelessly cynical from the mountain of existing evidence about Dumbocrat campaign financing machinations, but I can't help but be a little suspicious----okay a lot suspicious----when I see corporate types laying out big bucks.

Certain things standout like: Were these monies laundered somewhere, then illegally converted to campaign accounts? Did they pay taxes on this money? Did they juggle the books and maybe book campaign donations under "consultants" or "legal fees?"

The SEC doesn't like it when corporations file false financial statements (/sarc).


9 posted on 09/24/2004 11:00:40 PM PDT by Liz (The man who establishes the reputation of rising at dawn, can sleep til noon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

I would rather the "fatcats" fund ads instead of instigating revolution to throw out one government and replace it with a new one.


10 posted on 09/24/2004 11:03:32 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

"You listen to your gut and you go for it.''


This woman is not listening to her gut. If she were, she would have spent more money on Paregoric, and less on dribble.


11 posted on 09/24/2004 11:06:33 PM PDT by Just Lori (Exit strategy: Terrorism dead..... freedom flourishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

bump


12 posted on 09/24/2004 11:10:42 PM PDT by prophetic (Dems investigate for pre 9/11intel - but now we've LOTS of Intel and they claim politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Given that a fool and his money are soon parted, how much skimming do you suppose happens at these 527s, especially with money rolling in in million dollar chunks.
13 posted on 09/24/2004 11:12:09 PM PDT by DeFault User
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

::Sometimes I find myself angered by the fatcats and the fact that I do not have the thousands to drop into the hat.::

Yes, but you could boycott her clothing line. May not be much, but if enough people do it, perhaps it could diminish her campaign contributions for the next election.

Her clothes suck anyway. They are so 1992. Just like her political philosophy.


14 posted on 09/24/2004 11:18:59 PM PDT by ponygirl (http://morningjava.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I definitely like that title.
15 posted on 09/24/2004 11:19:27 PM PDT by jerry639
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Richard Pryor once said, "Cocaine is God's way of telling you you've got too much money".

The new "cocaine", evidently, is "politics".

May liberals and their trust funds be soon separated...

16 posted on 09/24/2004 11:20:14 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Of course I am angered by all three of our branches of government for bringing us this atrocity called CFR, but in our democratic process the majority of the voters get what they want, and unfortunately, a VAST majority of voters want CFR. Congress didn't dare oppose McCain-Feingold, the president didn't dare not sign it, and once it landed at the supreme court they sure weren't going to strike it down.


17 posted on 09/24/2004 11:24:32 PM PDT by spinestein (trade liberty for security, lose both, deserve neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

When they can't win fair, they scheme. It's always the rats. Don't we have any Soros-rich republican types who would LOVE to fund a FReeper 527?


18 posted on 09/24/2004 11:25:02 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick

Their hatred for Bush is so intense that they would vote for Mickey Mouse if it meant a Bush defeat. They really don't care about the country or they are very stupid.


19 posted on 09/24/2004 11:30:30 PM PDT by mombrown1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Military Chick
Service Employees International Union is a RAT union that supports illegal immigration and Commie healthcare. Thirty buck of my paycheck is confiscated by SEUI. I'm contract security for the FAA and I'm in a JANITORS UNION!

www.seiu.org
20 posted on 09/24/2004 11:40:50 PM PDT by endthematrix (Bad news is good news for the Kerry campaign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson