Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Repairman Jack; NCSteve; Jaysun; tacticalogic
Some social conservatives might support a federal law against the gays marrying.

A political conservative would not.

OK, I buy that for starters as a conflict. I would have said virtually all social conservatives would vehemently believe in preserving the existing definition of marriage, and some political conservatives would not.

53 posted on 09/24/2004 1:51:04 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: NutCrackerBoy


Just about the same, but the difference would be those who lean more politically than socially conservative would support preserving the existing definition of marriage, but not necessarily by federal law.


54 posted on 09/24/2004 1:53:24 PM PDT by Repairman Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: NutCrackerBoy
OK, I buy that for starters as a conflict. I would have said virtually all social conservatives would vehemently believe in preserving the existing definition of marriage, and some political conservatives would not.

Some political conservatives might not, but no political conservative would support changing it by decree of the federal government.

60 posted on 09/24/2004 1:59:28 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson