Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RetroSexual

This thread is bringing out the "I don't like it, so let's ban it" wing of Free Republic.

Let's not run around banning things simply because we can get 51% of the people to agree they don't want it, shall we? Not many good outcomes once you head down that road.

And for those who think this is terribly inhumane, why not head out to a fois gras farm and check it out. They have such farms in upstate New York. It's not quite what "Sir Paul" depicts.

Taking PETA's word on animal cruelty is slightly more stupid than taking Michael Moore's word on Iraq.


71 posted on 09/24/2004 10:45:18 AM PDT by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Snuffington
Let's not run around banning things simply because we can get 51% of the people to agree they don't want it, shall we?

The difference is that a living thing is demonstrably suffering to make a delicacy. If an inanimate thing is involved, I'd agree.

112 posted on 09/24/2004 11:10:46 AM PDT by I Blame the Parents (Hangover is the wrath of grapes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson