I think its amazingly brass of them to say "unfortunally most of it was wrong."
How the heck would they know. They're a bunch of monkeys in an office pretending to be around the globe, using other interoffice feeds to make up the news. Jayson Blair anybody?
For anyone to have a glimmer of credibility of an opinion on the situation in Iraq, it would help if they actually had a team of their own reporters, stationed with the Iraqi government-note to the NYT stationed with the terrorists does NOT count. It seems instead they rely on bogus AP docs, and from pics of ambushes we can tell who the AP is stationed with.
Then from an outside perspective they further the claims that the Prime Minister, who undoubtably gets much more info on one daily briefing of his nation, than the NYT prints facts in a year. I'm sure the NYT had the perspective to say the Prime Minister was wrong. NOT.
Dang it, should have done one more preview.
Meant to say that they believe they can challenge the claims. Actually I was going to say they "further the Forgery campaign's claims that the Prime Minister... is wrong about his own country"
When I went on to explain the bit about how the Prime Minister gets more info from one daily briefing than the NYT prints actual facts in a year I forgot to add the last part about the NYT claims.