Exactly, his March 3 story about receiving them from a mystery man is so bogus! He'd been public with his wild accusations against Bush since 1997, and now someone has supposedly provided the 'documents' to prove his case and bring down Bush, and he just calmly puts them on ice for a few hours, in the possession of SOMEONE ELSE???
I don't think so, especially since he wrote on August 13 that he had never seen anything from Killian to impugn Bush..... so Burkett's definitely a liar, but it will be so much fun to see whether CBS and the DNC dare to attack him (they have to, but it will then completely undermine their campaign against Bush).
I'm trying to catch up on this thread, but has anyone thought about how nuts this freak is, heance making him the perfect patsy. Dems have the documents, CBS gets tipped off about the documents, they drop the documents in the hands of a man already accusing Bush of this stuff, then gives CBS his name and sits back.
Then Lockhart tells him on the phone that he wants the documents, begs him for them. So now he has his alibi. Why would I ask for the documents if we gave him the documents.
So the dems can deal with a nutcase screaming that the dems wanted the documents. Sure, the dems would naturally want documents that are bad for bush - that's no secret. But they had them all ready and had to get them out through a third party who they could easily set up as a patsy...AKA the nutcase named Burkett.
It was dark and stormy night... the man(?) was short, waddled, and was wearing a dingy colored crusty pant suit.