Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. bans weed pulling by hand on farms
MSNBC ^ | 23 September 2004 | AP

Posted on 09/23/2004 6:14:50 PM PDT by pickemuphere

SACRAMENTO, Calif. - California became the first state Thursday to ban weeding by hand on most farms, saying the work is too backbreaking for laborers.

Under a rule approved by the California Occupational Safety and Health Division, farmworkers, in most cases, will not have to stoop to pull weeds, but will instead be given long-handled tools that will allow them to work without bending over. The rule takes effect within two weeks.

The regulation aims to prevent the “real and substantial risk of back injury” caused by stooping to weed or thin plants by hand, Cal-OSHA said. The workplace-safety agency had no estimate of how many California field hands hurt their backs.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: burdock; chickweed; dandelion; goldenrod; jimsonweed; lambsquarters; nannystate; nimblewill; spurge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: highpockets
Who cares strawberrys suck. I hate the damn things. Not joking, they taste about as good as okra.

I almost agree with you there. I like fresh strawberries, but anything else strawberry is horrid. People eat things like strawberry ice cream and cake around me purposely to gross me out.

61 posted on 09/23/2004 9:40:05 PM PDT by exDemMom (Think like a liberal? Oxymoron!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

NANNY GOVERNMENT STRIKES AGAIN!!!
Too bad we don't have the brains or stamina our forefathers (and mothers) had, what a sorry bunch of sissies.


62 posted on 09/23/2004 9:46:26 PM PDT by antceecee (MSM...time after time after time after time they tell lie after lie after lie after lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandbar
I don't see anything wrong with it and in my opinion, unless the farmer is hiring illegals, it would SAVE them money in workers compensation claims for injured backs.

True --- other businesses are expected to provide ergonomic equipment and safe working conditions --- why should it be so different if you hire a different set of workers --- and the illegals' health problems might not costs a dime to those who are getting rich off their cheap labor but their health ailments are certainly costing the taxpayers.

63 posted on 09/23/2004 11:29:22 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: FauxBlonde

Well, I know what my uncle (also a farmer) would say; damn time they work for their room and board instead of sitting on their @ss everyday complaining about the feather count in their pillows. They'd be to damn tired at night to cause a bunch of trouble. ~~


64 posted on 09/24/2004 12:40:13 AM PDT by JesseJane ( “fake but accurate” ... it’s like saying a body in a pine box is “dead but lifelike.” -- Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

guess we can look forward to foreign produce... sprayed with God knows what to kill weeds, and fertilized with local sewer water


65 posted on 09/24/2004 1:19:43 AM PDT by KneelBeforeZod (Deus Lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere
The new rule says farms cannot require workers to weed by hand for extended periods of time unless they can show that long-handled tools are not effective. If the workers must hand-weed, they must be given longer breaks, and there are restrictions on how much time they must spend toiling at the task.

Well, well, well. It appears that they really DON'T ban them, it just makes the farm go through a whole lot of effort to prove the measures are necessary.. I also see where "organic" farms are exempt..

66 posted on 09/24/2004 1:33:00 AM PDT by Experiment 6-2-6 (Meega, Nala Kweesta! Give A+BERT (snakeoil) his name back! Help him, JimRob, you're his only hope...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arjay
I wonder what would have happened if we would have had some government agency on hand at Plymouth to tell the new settlers that they could not do any backbreaking labor?

Good question!

I, too, long for those days in which the average life expectancy was about 45 years.

67 posted on 09/24/2004 5:56:25 AM PDT by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere

I understand your point and I am all in favor of protecting people, all people, from backbreaking work if there is any other way around it.

I am simply saying that this country was built on the hard work and dedication of people willing to do any kind of work, no matter how hard or dangerous, to develop our nation. The nanny state works to break that spirit and drive.

We must have rules and laws to protect folks in the workplace. No question. But there is a line between reasonable rules and killing progress.


68 posted on 09/24/2004 8:20:22 AM PDT by arjay (If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

Well, I know what my uncle (also a farmer) would say; damn time they work for their room and board instead of sitting on their @ss everyday complaining about the feather count in their pillows. They'd be to damn tired at night to cause a bunch of trouble. ~~



He'd honestly have no problem with a bunch of inmates running all over his farm?


69 posted on 09/24/2004 8:47:35 AM PDT by FauxBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FauxBlonde
Nope.. You wouldn't expect them to be unguarded would you?? Heck, bring back the chain gang... (j/k...sortof).. Electronic bracelets for tracking, in case one gets loose, and if they do.. well, just 5 years to their sentance... Move them to the rock plant...
70 posted on 09/24/2004 8:59:22 AM PDT by JesseJane ( “fake but accurate” ... it’s like saying a body in a pine box is “dead but lifelike.” -- Lileks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson