AS USUAL, the reporter displays his complete ignorance. NOT ALL of the states electoral votes are allocated in a "winner-take-all" fashion. There ARE states that allocate electoral votes according to other criteria--one state (don't recall which at the moment) having the electoral vote allocated by party majority vote in its Congressional districts, with two votes (representing the "Senatorial" electors) allocated according to the overall state majority vote.
Two states -- Maine and Nebraska.
In Maine the EV's get divided up in special cases.
The popular vote winner gets 2 EV's, the winner of Congressional District #1 gets 1EV and the winner of Cong Dist #2 gets 1EV. Bush is slightly ahead in Cong Dist #2 and slightly ahead, within margin of error in the state as a whole.
Two states I know of that do that are Nebraska and Maine. I think Bush got one electoral vote in Maine last time, but I might be mistaken. If it turns out to be another cliff-hanger (which I doubt) ONE electoral vote could make the difference however, and these are strange times we're living in.