To: gopwinsin04
Who here on FR has been interviewed by the NY Slimes for this report?
To: frog_jerk_2004
To: frog_jerk_2004
How are they both going to fit on the cover?
To: frog_jerk_2004
How can they accurately portray FR without interviewing anyone involved with it? Is Jayson Blair writing the piece? Do they want to have any credibility?
Is anyone else sick of FR being referred to as a blog? I know that the true blogs played a large role in the unmasking of SeeBS, but FR is widely recognized as being the instigator (thanks to Buckhead!!) of the forgery probes. And FR is not a blog.
12 posted on
09/23/2004 1:24:03 PM PDT by
cwiz24
To: frog_jerk_2004
Who here on FR has been interviewed by the NY Slimes for this report?Some guy named Dan Rather with National Enquirer called me about this just this morning. Seems he's trying to scoop the NYT.
17 posted on
09/23/2004 1:28:44 PM PDT by
umgud
(speaking strictly as an infidel,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
To: frog_jerk_2004
Who here on FR has been interviewed by the NY Slimes for this report? Be sure and wear your best Pajamas and bunny slippers. Don't confuse them with references to moose and cheese. Excuse yourself before the end of the interview because you've got an incoming call from Karl Rove. (Let's keep our enemies paranoid as hell.)
To: frog_jerk_2004
Who here on FR has been interviewed by the NY Slimes for this report? When has NOT "interviewing" sources, ever stop NY Slimes from "doing a hatchet job on someone/something."..a la Jason Blair
25 posted on
09/23/2004 1:45:16 PM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson