Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend
From the Al Hunt article in WSJ

T]he picture painted of John Kerry as an indecisive flip-flopper has taken hold. Although the Democratic nominee has barely slipped in his head-to-head matchup with the president, even voters who want change aren't convinced yet that he possesses the strength of character to be commander in chief. The Republicans gladly take credit for this though, in fairness, the ineptitude of the Democratic candidate and campaign has helped

From the Slate article:

Right up until Labor Day, Kerry sat on a six-point lead in most polls; the original headline for this piece, in fact, was going to be "Swung." The numbers looked grim for the president. According to the August Keystone poll, 11 percent of his 2000 voters now said they were voting Kerry; one-third of Howard Stern's substantial Pennsylvania audience (in the Pittsburgh, Philly, and Harrisburg markets) said he'd persuaded them to switch from Bush to Kerry. (Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity have more listeners statewide, but as Keystone pollster Terry Madonna notes, "Their audience is already on their side.") Even in the middle of the state, Bush was barely polling above 50 percent. But Kerry's numbers stayed weak. People weren't swinging; they were waiting—for a reason to vote for one side or the other. Unfortunately for Kerry, he hasn't been able to give them one

The Chicago Tribune article didn't exactly say that Kerry hasn't given the voters any reason to vote for him, but they did say that he was confusing the voters:

Kerry gave little definition to the change of course he represents. He did, though, say: "We could begin to withdraw U.S. forces starting next summer and realistically aim to bring all our troops home within the next four years." That's the kind of specificity that different listeners hear in different ways. Appreciative Americans might fairly conclude that Kerry wants to bring our boys and girls home. Other groups — nervous Iraqi citizens awaiting democracy, the vicious insurgents who plague them, and the coalition forces serving alongside U.S. troops — might fairly conclude that the Democrat who would be president is primarily interested in getting the heck out of Iraq ASAP.

346 posted on 09/23/2004 9:05:55 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

Howard Stern listeners.........OMG..................


353 posted on 09/23/2004 9:09:39 AM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson