Sowell shines the blinding light of truth on kerry's abject LACK of presidential qualifications.
[you don't have to excerpt townhall, do you?]
1 posted on
09/22/2004 10:24:47 PM PDT by
smonk
To: smonk
And the dems want us to concentrate on Bush supposedly missing several months of National Guard service. 20 years of taking up oxygen and warming a seat in Congress with nothing to show for it? What a slacker.
2 posted on
09/22/2004 10:32:19 PM PDT by
camboianchristmas
(when two or more or gathered in His name...great things happen)
To: smonk
Thomas Sowell. Always excellent.
To: smonk
How many bills did Kerry actually introduce? How many of them made it out of a committee?
4 posted on
09/22/2004 10:38:24 PM PDT by
NorseWood
To: smonk
My thoughts exactly. I've been saying the same but not as well. John Kerry has been a do-nothing, no-show Senator for 20 years. Was referred to as a backbencher by the Clinton administration. What exactly is his claim to fame? 4 months in Vietnam?
Yet this sniveling punk has a big mouth on him when it comes to George Bush who has a record he can run on. One that can be praised or criticized.
5 posted on
09/22/2004 10:42:31 PM PDT by
dennisw
(Gd is against Amelek for all generations.)
To: smonk
If the same job applicant who won't discuss his own qualifications just keeps complaining about the performance of someone whose job he wants to take, would you think that was enough reason to hire him? ROTFL - it isn't even an analogy. It's the literal truth.
To: smonk
To: smonk
"If someone applied to you for a job but didn't want to talk about what he has been doing in the last 20 years, wouldn't you be suspicious?"There it is, Bush-Cheney 2004 - - the first line of your next TV ad.
Take it and run with it.
To: smonk
I think it's very telling that SENATOR Kerry's committee attendance is just one more record he wants to keep hidden.
11 posted on
09/22/2004 10:54:30 PM PDT by
ChocChipCookie
(Really! I'm just a nice little stay-at-home mom!)
To: smonk
The issue of Kerry's Senate record has been raised many times, but does not seem to have gotten any traction.
The principle reason is that Kerry does not talk much about it and nobody has been able to hang him with it.
His endlessly touted Vietnam service served ironically and justly to give traction to the Swift Boat Vets's effort against him.
Kerry is wise not to much raise the issue of his Senate record to a prominent point of his campaign. The paper trail of so many years is much more extensive and accurate than the combat records and citations of four months service in Vietnam 35 years ago. His laziness, non attendance, bloviations on the Senate floor, and steadfast opposition to so many Military programs and Anti-Soviet foreign policy positions will scream to high heaven if brought to the fore. In short, he is a liberal Senator from Massachusetts.
To: smonk
20 posted on
09/22/2004 11:56:39 PM PDT by
madison46
(Bandwagon was full when it left the gate - I hope it remains too full for frogs & co.)
To: smonk
This is, not surprisingly considering who wrote it, THE most cogent article I have yet seen on the matter of the upcoming presidential election!
22 posted on
09/23/2004 6:41:32 AM PDT by
Bigun
(IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
To: maui_hawaii; ATOMIC_PUNK
23 posted on
09/23/2004 6:43:10 AM PDT by
Bigun
(IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
To: smonk
PBS had Nancy Pelosi on for a half hour last nite, attacking, spinning, promising big programs. Definitely appealing to the "what has government done for me lately" crowd.
If Kerry gets in, this crowd will dig deep into my wallet.
25 posted on
09/23/2004 9:52:57 AM PDT by
Ciexyz
("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
To: smonk
Thanks. This really says it all!
26 posted on
09/23/2004 5:52:45 PM PDT by
Ooh-Ah
To: smonk
27 posted on
09/23/2004 5:53:48 PM PDT by
Mike Bates
(You're getting drowsy. You will buy my book, you will buy my book, you will buy my book. . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson