Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calcowgirl

You said:

"Not conservative enough???
Not conservative at all. " (About Arnie)

Then you said,

"What is it about the word "ILLEGAL" you don't understand.
The bill should have never been entertained... just more wasted State resources."

My point is that Arnie had no choice but to "entertain" it. It was planted in his lap by the representatives. And I said, let's give credit where it's due since ARNIE veto'd the bill.

k?


106 posted on 09/23/2004 1:05:47 PM PDT by Hi Heels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Hi Heels
My point is that Arnie had no choice but to "entertain" it.

And your point is wrong. He "entertained" Cedillo for at least 6 monts. Arnold said on multiple occasions "we will make this happen".... and continued to work with Cedillo on the ill-founded issue of "security" measures. "Security" is NOT the issue.

My point stands: What is it about ILLEGAL that you don't understand?

Arnold does not oppose drivers licenses for ILLEGALS... THAT is my issue and the reason that he will get no kudos from me on this veto. No amount of "security" measures make this palatable.

110 posted on 09/23/2004 2:15:23 PM PDT by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson