[Colofornian]

There is some weird kind of bait-'n-switch diversionary tactic going on here - - some kind of game. This whole thing sounds really fishy to me, like Burkett is being set up somehow.... For exactly what, I don't know yet.

I've said since Sunday that Burkett is the Oswald-like patsy who has been bounced around in exactly the same Texas style Lee Harvey was by octopus operative Guy Bannister.

But it is critical to remember that David Van Os works for the Democrat Party, not Bill Burkett. He will throw Burkett overboard in a heartbeat to protect Kerry and the scumbag Democrats. Van Os takes his orders from Kerry's handlers, and Bill Burkett doesn't know it yet, but he is toast.

Van Os is doing two things: (1) Adding confusion to the original source of the fabrication so that any sorting out will go beyond Nov. 2; (2) He is encouraging Burkett to sue CBS so that whoever winds up being Burkett's attorney can squelch his conversing w/the media by reminding him, "You can't say a thing lest you risk your upcoming civil trial." Of course, they'll never be one. Right at the point of a trial, CBS suddenly settles out of court. Part of the settlement is that Burkett has to stay quiet. Burkett is legally paid off; all of this is bumped out of the immediate frame of the media; Burkett's mouth is zipped; and confusion reigns as each points fingers at someone else.

[Lancey Howard]

Thanks for the reply - - your points are good ones.
By the way, I have zero faith in this two-man commission CBS put together. Wasn't Thornburgh involved in the theft of Inslaw from the Hamiltons? Regardless, I smell a whitewash coming.

The whole thing will end up a mess. Our only hope to make hay before the election is lots of investigative reporters nosing around and a lot of pressure and vigilance from us pajama people.

Regards,
LH