Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happy2BMe
While Phil is right, it does not specifically state the mosque was hit as a result of enemy fire coming from it, there is still room to believe that retaliation did not ensue.

It's pretty clear that there was no retaliation for the attack from the mosque: "The Soldiers did not return fire. "

The story was not written in chronological order. In order, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 3, ending with the attack from the mosque, then paragraph 1, picking back up with the attack from the mosque, with no return fire. Finally, Paragraph 4 with the outcome summary.

35 posted on 09/22/2004 6:27:23 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: PAR35; SJackson; Happy2BMe; Ragtime Cowgirl
I revere our troops, beyond "having a little faith" in them.

I am well aware that Democrats and media in this country serve as the fifth-column, merrily giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

I marvel at the elegance evinced in 34 above.

I would urge this commander-in-chief to put that policy in the form of a bold national security memorandum,

--to make said memorandum public--

--to clarify the Bush doctrine--

File the entire proposal under the easy-to-remember heading

Go Ahead: Make My Day

Further this deponent sayeth not.

52 posted on 09/22/2004 8:12:02 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson