Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFC__VRWC
Well, they actually didn't need Graham. Goss got 77 votes. Even without Graham, they had more than the 60 votes needed to avoid a filibuster.

Graham did vote for Goss, though. Just kinda interesting . . .
61 posted on 09/22/2004 5:10:32 PM PDT by theophilusscribe (Other than that unfortunate incident with the hamster, Kerry has done nothing "heroic" in decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: theophilusscribe
Well, they actually didn't need Graham. Goss got 77 votes. Even without Graham, they had more than the 60 votes needed to avoid a filibuster.

If they had been able to get Graham to pull his support for Goss, the Rats would have been able to rush to the media and proclaim, "Senator Graham has worked with Goss for years and years, and he's a senator from Goss' home state, so if Bob Graham has doubts I have to consider that" and yada yada yada. They would have been able to get a lot more than 17 to vote against the confirmation then - in fact, they would have easily gotten more than 40 and thus would have been able to filibuster.

My guess is they'll pursue Plan B - watch Goss like a hawk, and the instant he does or says something they don't like, pounce on it and try to make it into a scandal so they can demand his resignation.

64 posted on 09/22/2004 5:33:35 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson