Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court rules Nader too late for Illinois ballot
AP via Belleville News-Democrat ^ | September 22, 2004 | MIKE ROBINSON

Posted on 09/22/2004 12:50:19 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John

CHICAGO - A federal appeals court on Wednesday refused to give independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader a spot on the Illinois ballot, saying his lawsuit against state election officials who turned him down came too late.

The courts acted quickly on his suit, but it came so late that "Nader created a situation in which any remedial order would throw the state's preparations for the election into turmoil," a three-judge panel of the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said.

The decision was a boon to Democrats who expect their presidential nominee, John Kerry, to win Illinois but were worried that Nader would draw votes away from him as he did against Al Gore four years ago.

The 11-page opinion written by Judge Richard Posner upheld an Aug. 23 decision by U.S. District Judge Matthew Kennelly, who refused to order state officials to put the consumer advocate's name on the presidential ballot for the Nov. 2 election.

On June 21, the deadline for turning in petitions, Nader submitted petitions with 32,437 signatures on them to the State Board of Elections. The law requires 25,000.

Elections officials, acting on a complaint, reviewed the signatures and disqualified 12,327 that they determined belonged to people who were not registered to vote at the addresses listed on the petitions. Nader supporters submitted 7,000 more names later, but officials refused to count them because they were turned in after the June 21 deadline.

Nader claimed the June 21 deadline, the 25,000-signatures requirement and the rule involving addresses were unconstitutional.

The appeals court said that "it would be inequitable to order preliminary relief in a suit filed so gratuitously late in the campaign season."

The court acknowledged that its decision represented a setback for Nader followers but added that it would be worse "if a last-minute injunction disrupts the presidential election in Illinois." The court noted that absentee ballots without Nader's name had already been mailed to overseas voters.

If Nader really believed that the rules were unconstitutional, he could have filed suit when he declared his candidacy in February, the court said. "And Nader's supporters can, of course, cast write-in votes for him in November," the court added.

Nader is currently on the ballot in more than 30 states and has faced court challenges in 17.

On Tuesday, Nader criticized Democrats for backing lawsuits to keep him off state ballots, but he also said, "It just reinforces our determination


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: ballotaccess; democratscheat; nader; ralphnader; rats; richardposner

1 posted on 09/22/2004 12:50:21 PM PDT by Land_of_Lincoln_John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Oh well...that just means IL is the only state that will go to Kerry...


2 posted on 09/22/2004 12:52:00 PM PDT by RockinRight (W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
I hear Dumbocrats are a little confused as to why they fought so hard to keep Nader off "blue state" ballots while he's on many "swing state" ballots. This allows Nader to spend more time competing for votes in states where sKerry is weaker.

I heard Begala one day last week as much as admit that they've been idiotic to take Nader away from having to politic in states like Illinois. LOL

3 posted on 09/22/2004 12:55:20 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Ah, so the precident is set... Hillary can't get on the ballot if the Dems pull the Torrecelli Option.


4 posted on 09/22/2004 1:01:00 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John
Just more evidence of the travesty of the Rats anthem(every vote counts...sometimes twice). JFK is leading by example by bringing together polar opposites as Nader and the Swiftees. All are after his pale narcissistic putrid carcass.
8 posted on 09/22/2004 1:16:49 PM PDT by crazyhorse691 (I volunteer to instruct JFK on the meaning of a purple heart!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Baredog
I hear Dumbocrats are a little confused as to why they fought so hard to keep Nader off "blue state" ballots while he's on many "swing state" ballots

I read a post on the DUmp a few months ago saying they weren't really worried about Nader because he promised not to campaign in swing states. This article makes it seem the big bosses are more worried than they tell the 'little people'.

9 posted on 09/22/2004 2:05:52 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

And when Kerry still loses by a landslide, they will blame it on the voting machines being too technical for Kerry supporters to figure out. That will probably be true, but is it Bush's fault that only idiots vote for Kerry?


10 posted on 09/22/2004 2:12:05 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (Vote Kerry-Edwards...........................out of office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John

Nader should appeal to the NJ Supreme court.


11 posted on 09/22/2004 2:13:02 PM PDT by snooker (French Fried Flip Flopper still Flouncing, be careful out there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
This article makes it seem the big bosses are more worried than they tell the 'little people'.

SOP for DUmbocrats.

12 posted on 09/22/2004 4:21:55 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson