Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
The example given assumed a relatively open area. The blast damage would be confined in an urban area, as you pointed out. The EMP would not, if some shots fired in the 1970s and 1980s are any indication.

What shots are those? Do you have a link? I ask because this EMP business is a boogieman that comes up all the time and I would like to know as much as I can.

In that link I gave you it stated that, even with a 1 Mt bomb, the EMP effects (of a ground burst) are significant only out to five miles.

I can't imagine how the presence of conductive material near ground zero could amplify the EMP.

176 posted on 09/23/2004 8:56:21 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Evans
What shots are those? Do you have a link? I ask because this EMP business is a boogieman that comes up all the time and I would like to know as much as I can.

The Dauphin and Cottage shots were biggies--they were part of the X-ray laser tests.

I can't imagine how the presence of conductive material near ground zero could amplify the EMP.

Same principle as how your bedsprings can start "talking" when a powerful transmitter is nearby.

Basically, everything reradiates. It doesn't amplify; but it DOES provide a propagation path to allow damaging levels of EMP to go beyond the blast zone.

A Faraday cage--which all this wiring SORT of creates, but not completely--is protection only up to a point. If the EMP is powerful enough to activate everything the cage is made of, it actually tends to focus the EMP inside the cage.

179 posted on 09/24/2004 6:02:30 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson