Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
We may need to rethink a LOT of policies--such as the desire to stuff as many people as humanly possible into close quarters and call the result "urban planning."

I agree. With the technology we have, cities are obsolete. Dispersal of the population is a good thing that is being disparaged as "suburban sprawl" by urban politicians who see it as a shrinking tax base.

But the fires that DO start will not get put out, and will continue dumping secondary activation products downwind,

There has never been a nuclear ground burst in city before so we can only speculate. Anything shielded by a building would not catch fire and would receive a lot less blast damage. It would not be a firestorm.

142 posted on 09/23/2004 10:11:08 AM PDT by Dan Evans ("ten to twenty million tops" -- General Turgidson, "Dr Stranglove")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]


To: Dan Evans
There has never been a nuclear ground burst in city before so we can only speculate. Anything shielded by a building would not catch fire and would receive a lot less blast damage. It would not be a firestorm.

Actually, the modern architectural style (glass facades that are very reflective in the SWIR and LWIR bands) would probably wind up igniting a bunch of fires--the initial thermal pulse would get reflected every which way (before those windows blew in/out) and hit just about every flammable surface available. Instant fires...the lack of a major blast wave would actually tend to keep those fires lit.

145 posted on 09/23/2004 10:16:36 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson