Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Evans
In a city, the fallout would settle on the roof of multistory buildings. People would only need to move down a few stories to be safe -- protected by several inches of concrete and steel.

The fallout also settles in the streets--and that means nobody leaves those buildings for almost a week. Also remember that the localized EMP will clobber the local power grid--no refrigeration. The ground shock fractures the water pipes--no firefighting capability, plus no drinking water. Most of the buildings in the lethal area will not have window glass, so external air will circulate into the buildings.

Blow the thing off at lunchtime, and you've got a million-plus people out in the open for the crud to land on.

137 posted on 09/23/2004 5:26:09 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
The fallout also settles in the streets--and that means nobody leaves those buildings for almost a week.

People would be able to travel in the streets to be evacuated. You can survive heavy radiation doses for a short time. I remember talking to a friend who photographed inside a nuclear reactor after an accident in the fifties. He said the film was so badly fogged by radiation that they had to go back in and re-shoot it.

A ground burst would not cause nearly the fire damage that an air burst would because the most of the city would be shadowed by the nearest buildings.

Lack of water, electricity and refrigeration are pretty much standard inconveniences that we deal with during disasters.

138 posted on 09/23/2004 8:10:48 AM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson