Viacom lie debunked here on Snopes.com
YORK: Right. The way it was measured there were points that you, as a Guardsman, accumulated toward your retirement. And the minimum standard per year, as a Guardsman, was that you had to get 50 points. And so one thing you can do with the records that the White House released is look through...
HUME: Now, we've got a table here showing what your investigation indicated he earned, right?
YORK: These are things added up from the documents the White House released in February. And they show that in his first full year, which was May '68 to May '69, Bush accumulated more than 253 points, next year 340, next year 137, then 112. What you can see is in the last two years of his six-year commitment, he gets just 56 points a year, which is very close, just above the minimum of 50 that you need to accumulate each year.
HUME: Now, some questions have been raised about those last two years and perhaps about these points. Explain how he did get those points, if you can.
YORK: Well, as you know, in the spring of 1972, he asked to leave Texas to go to Alabama to work on a Senate campaign. He was granted permission to go to an Air National Guard base in Alabama. And he missed several months. I mean there are several months in 1972 where he did not show up. There is no record that he showed up for duty in Alabama.
HUME: So a guy doesn't show up for duty. Is that in itself enough to mean that you haven't met your requirements?
YORK: Not that I understand it. The people who were in the Guard at the time tell me that this was not at all uncommon.
HUME: So what did you do then?
YORK: Well, you made it up. So what Bush did was in late 1972 and early 1973, you can see different periods in which he had kind of a flurry of activity, in which he went to drills enough to accumulate more than the minimum of points that he needed. It was nothing like he had done in the first couple of years where he got hundreds of points, but it was more than what was required. Then, as you know, he asked to be let out of his Guard service completely to go to Harvard Business School.
HUME: Now, that would have been prior to the end of the six-year period, correct?
YORK: That's exactly right.
HUME: Now that was the period where there are some documents suggesting that this is when he going to go to Boston, right? And to go to what? Harvard Business School (search).
YORK: Exactly.
HUME: Some documents indicated he was supposed to find a unit up there to report to, but he never did. What about that?
YORK: Well, as I understand it, in May 1973, the sixth year began. And in June and July, he did a lot of activity, accumulated 56 points just in those two months. So he kind of covered it. He asked for a discharge in October, was granted an honorable discharge from the Air National Guard. And as I understand it, that ended his...
HUME: And by that time, he did have enough points?
YORK: He did. And that ended his obligation. So he served five years and four months of a six-year...
HUME: So he didn't need to report in Boston? Legitimately didn't need to report?
YORK: No. It was after he received his honorable discharge, he did not have a further obligation.
HUME: All right. Well, not at great length but very succinctly, that seems to be what George Bush did to get his points.
Thank you, Byron.
YORK: Thank you.
btttttttttttttttt
Don't listen to the DEMOCRAT LIAR'S TALKING POINTS!!!
These are the FACTS!!!
bttt
do you know anything about how hard it was to get into the guard in the first place?
was there a line of applicants?
just wondering...still unclear...
No, his honorable discharge dropped out of the sky, not unlike manna from heaven!
Parenthetically, I really appreciate Brit Hume. He gets to the point when treating an issue, and usually "zeros in" on the salient points whenever things seem to wander.
And Brit does it in an objective, non-partisan way, IMHO.
He's a great asset to Fox News, and would be to any news organization, for that matter.
Maybe he needs to go to CBS to give them some credibility.
A huge majority of those who are internet-savvy see CBS as a total joke at this point.
And many of the mainstream critics of CBS are hardly conservatives.
Rather and CBS's reputation lie in shreds now, IMHO. But I digress...
I refuse to read either.
Viacom lie debunked here on Snopes.com