To: Poohbah
The Russian military is a relatively weak instrument in the best of times for this stuff; it is a bludgeon, not a scalpel. This is a universal problem. What was the ratio of the rescued in Waco to the dead? Better than in Moscow theatre or Beslan?
202 posted on
09/22/2004 3:36:19 PM PDT by
A. Pole
(Madeleine Albright:"We are the indispensable nation. We stand tall. We see further into the future.")
To: A. Pole
This is a universal problem. What was the ratio of the rescued in Waco to the dead? Better than in Moscow theatre or Beslan?Waco wasn't intended, IMNHO, to be a rescue.
However, successful rescues HAVE been accomplished. The Iranian embassy in London, 1980 (fictionalized as "The Final Option," an otherwise forgettable movie that is, according to those in the biz, spot-on in depicting a hostage rescue), the Israelis at Entebbe, and the German GSG-9 pulled one off in Somalia in the 1970s.
204 posted on
09/22/2004 3:38:48 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
To: A. Pole
A. Pole wrote: The Russian military is a relatively weak instrument in the best of times for this stuff; it is a bludgeon, not a scalpel.
This is a universal problem. What was the ratio of the rescued in Waco to the dead? Better than in Moscow theatre or Beslan?
I think Putin's Beslan/Moscow theatre provocation and the Clinton administration's massacre at Waco is an unfair comparison. Putin's massacre was an intentional provocation, whereas Waco was due to the heavy-handed tactics of an anti-Relious zealot named Janet Reno (but not intentional, IMO).
216 posted on
09/22/2004 4:23:25 PM PDT by
GIJoel
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson