Skip to comments.
Missing signature mars launch of war on hunger (Bush Admin refuses to back global tax)
Sydney Morning Herald ^
| September 22, 2004
| Irwin Arieff in New York
Posted on 09/21/2004 11:06:36 AM PDT by dead
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Well, heres some absolutely great news that I knew nothing about. Go Bush!
1
posted on
09/21/2004 11:06:37 AM PDT
by
dead
To: dead
Socialism and Communism have starved more people than the UN could even imagine helping...
2
posted on
09/21/2004 11:09:03 AM PDT
by
2banana
(They want to die for Islam and we want to kill them)
To: dead
3
posted on
09/21/2004 11:09:11 AM PDT
by
RockinRight
(W stands for whoop-a**!!!)
To: dead
A Conservative America will never sign that!!!
That's outrageous! To think that the world leaders think they'll actually collect the money, and a pity that some people think this is anything but a way for corrupt UN officials to replace their cash cow, the Oil for Food program.
To: dead
" 'Economic growth is the long-term solution to hunger and poverty,' she told the meeting."
And so is killing off corrupt leaders who take aid money and use it to buy planes and limousines for themselves.
5
posted on
09/21/2004 11:10:04 AM PDT
by
SilentServiceCPOWife
(I think...therefore, I am a conservative.)
To: dead
Yeah, the UN did such a great job running Oil For Food, we should just hand them 71 billion a year...
6
posted on
09/21/2004 11:10:11 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Kerry could have left 'Nam within a week if Purple Hearts were awarded for shots to the foot.)
To: dead
Oh, the mean President Bush throwing cold water on the U.N. plan to replace the revenue stream they lost from Oil-for-Food when he invaded Iraq. Now, how will the hard-working bureaucrats at the U.N. ever get to be rich?
7
posted on
09/21/2004 11:10:26 AM PDT
by
Excuse_Me
(Bush has shown that he can fight terrorism. Kerry has only shown that he can fight Vietnam vets.)
To: dead
8
posted on
09/21/2004 11:10:31 AM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
To: dead
Gee maybe its because we already tried wealth transfers in this country to the tune of over $5 trillion in the so-called war on poverty -- and it hasn't worked.
9
posted on
09/21/2004 11:11:21 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Santorum 2008)
To: dead
They F'd up trying to feed Iraqi's why the hell would we bank roll that obviously corrupt organization more than we already do.
To: dead
The United States gives more food to the 3rd world than all these countries put together. 'nuff said.
To: 2banana
Why don't they just abolish dictatorships? That would solve most of the global hunger problem right there.
To: 2banana
Socialism and Communism have starved more people than the UN could even imagine helping...Socialism and Communism have starved more people than the UN.
You should have stopped at that.
13
posted on
09/21/2004 11:12:21 AM PDT
by
Stonedog
(Mr. Blather... tear down this STONEWALL!!)
To: dead
Go Bush! Don't tax my credit card transactions to give a free ride to some dictator who doesn't care if his people starve.
14
posted on
09/21/2004 11:12:25 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
("FR, best viewed with a budgie on hand")
To: dead
These euro-trash countries are something else (I won't say what -- don't want to get banned!!) They are always whining for the USA to give money, money, money to their schemes and/or to come to the aid of one country or another. Yet, when we need their help, i.e., Iraq, they give us the middle finger salute. I'm tired of it! Good for Bush for standing up to these moochers!
15
posted on
09/21/2004 11:12:31 AM PDT
by
Polyxene
(For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
To: dead
Sounds like a French agricultural export subsidy scheme.
16
posted on
09/21/2004 11:12:49 AM PDT
by
Shermy
To: dead
I've got an idea. You guys start. Goa head spend away. If you abolish half the poverty in the world. We'll do the rest. Deal?
17
posted on
09/21/2004 11:12:57 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Santorum 2008)
To: dead
"The greatest scandal is not that hunger exists but that it persists, even when we have the means to eliminate it. It is time to take action," read a declaration signed by 110 nations and adopted at the close of a summit on hunger on Monday. Let us compile a list of countries, including these morally smug ones, and the corresponding amount each contributes to world hunger ---- or any humanitarian aid of any type.
Then let's talk again.
Until then, dear Euro-eunuchs, high-horse moralizing twits, buzz off!
18
posted on
09/21/2004 11:13:28 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(I don't do diplomacy either)
To: dead
Notice how they try to put a pretty face on a fascist take over of Americas economy. "It's for the sake of the poor."
19
posted on
09/21/2004 11:13:33 AM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: dirtboy
It's the replacement for Food for Oil. Call it Food for Oil II.
20
posted on
09/21/2004 11:13:54 AM PDT
by
Shermy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson