Wasn't March or April about the time the Hildebeast talked about an October surprise? If so, sounds like premeditated planning.
"sounds like premeditated planning."
I agree with your redundancy.
Yep. This was their October Surprise, but I'll bet they never expected the surprise to be on them. For once they got bitten by their own snake.
Wasn't March or April about the time the Hildebeast talked about an October surprise? If so, sounds like premeditated planning.
===
Yes.
www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/3/30/123728.shtml - 22k
Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:36 p.m. EST Hillary Predicts October Surprise
New York Sen. Hillary Clinton is predicting that this year's presidential election will be very tight and the victor will win because of "something unforeseen."
"It will be very close," the former first lady tells the New York Post's Cindy Adams.
On how the contest will ultimately be decided, Clinton said, "It will be outside forces - something unforeseen that suddenly happens - that tilts the election one way or the other."
In 1992, Clinton's husband won the White House after Reagan Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger was indicted on Iran-Contra charges four days before the vote. Though the indictment was later overturned, the charges were enough to reverse President Bush 41's last-minute surge in the polls to within one point of Clinton.
In 2000 - again four days before the vote - a Democrat operative in Maine uncovered court records from Bush 43's then-24-year-old DUI stop. Bush's 5-point lead in Florida dwindled to a mere 537 votes, with the DUI news making Gore the popular vote winner nationwide.
"sounds like premeditated planning"
Premeditated planning of fraud is not a crime, but premeditated fraud is.
If you attended the Redundancy School of Redundancy, you would know this already if you attended.