Well, let's just say this. The man who attacked the soldier did it with his fist. John Kerry does it with his flip flops and his historic betrayal in Vietnam. So what's the difference and where is the outrage?
It's a little reprise of what worked for Kerry and pal Ted in Vietnam days. Fortunately they're having real trouble getting any critical mass in today's world. The constituency of the stoned attackers from behind ain't what it used to be.