Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lonster
i'm not sure that this is damaging to the dems. after all, they can note that HE made this a stipulation and they wouldn't speak with him. they also can deny that they spoke of the documents. this can be spun into a positive for them.

Nobody will believe anything any of these people say. They have no credibility.

The blood's in the water. I expect some investigative reporters want to be the next Woodward and Bernstein, and are digging, as we speak.

110 posted on 09/20/2004 7:56:27 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur

You're dead on. FREEPERS!!!!!!!!


117 posted on 09/20/2004 7:58:19 PM PDT by starvingstudent (ask your favorite leftist: "If there is another civil war, who do you think will win?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
i don't mean to down play this but i believe that it will be buried in a week by one thing or another. the fact that this happened over a month out of the election gives the dems and their lackeys in the media lots of time to spin and spin. look for new talking points to be distributed to all the liberal pundits in the next two days or so. after all, clinton is probably not 100 percent recovered from surgery yet. if clinton could spin his way out of lying under oath then anything is possible yaknow. nothing surprises me anymore. that aside, this is great because it moots the distortions the liberal hit men have lambasted the president with pertaining to his service. so good has come of it to say the least. also, look for this to blunt skerry's blathering this morning.
127 posted on 09/20/2004 8:04:45 PM PDT by lonster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson