Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom
Some are speculating that if this was a concerted effort to bring down Bush with forgeries, why didn't they come up with something more explosive? I believe that this was just the first of many such stories (forgeries)to come out. Remember, that some of CBS experts have stated, they were given many more documents than the 4-6 that we know about. I think this retreaded TX ANG story was just the beginning. CBS was going to get everyones attention, and get the story churning. Maybe draw Bush into the fracas, then drop some big bomb on him. It may have been coordinated with the Fortunate Son campaign, along with the Kitty Kelly book.

But when the first CBS story quickly turned to the possibility of forgeries, they had to put everything else on the backburner. My guess, drug use, a rape or something else was going to be dropping over the next few weeks. Just a theory, but makes you wonder. Because was CBS came out with on Sept 8th, wasn't a big deal if even true. Most of it was already known or suspected by almost everyone. Where was the story?

251 posted on 09/20/2004 7:51:43 PM PDT by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: gswilder

Don't the dems say "It's the seriousness of the charges", for their reason to investigate anything. --

Doesn't need to be true, just serious!


258 posted on 09/20/2004 7:53:34 PM PDT by NavySEAL F-16 (Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder
IMHO, the dems and MSM were planning a multiple front attack. The guard story was only one angle. To much to get done and coordinated. It's the little things that get you.

Dan thought he could play act his way through the memos. After all, he's done it before and it worked.
261 posted on 09/20/2004 7:54:11 PM PDT by Tarpon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder
Accusing the President of disobeying a direct order IS explosive.

why didn't they come up with something more explosive?

267 posted on 09/20/2004 7:56:02 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder

I think you may be right about part of this. I don't know about the drug use and rape but I suspect they were trying to force Bush to talk and then catch him in a supposed lie based on the fake documents. The best laid plans........


277 posted on 09/20/2004 7:58:13 PM PDT by manx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder
But when the first CBS story quickly turned to the possibility of forgeries, they had to put everything else on the backburner. My guess, drug use, a rape or something else was going to be dropping over the next few weeks. Just a theory, but makes you wonder. Because was CBS came out with on Sept 8th, wasn't a big deal if even true. Most of it was already known or suspected by almost everyone. Where was the story?

Perthaps you should check this out: The Motive

It was all supposed to tie together the cocaine angle.

309 posted on 09/20/2004 8:05:27 PM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder

Who was the person with the stack of docs from CBS? Pierce?


377 posted on 09/20/2004 8:35:56 PM PDT by bt_dooftlook ((Kerry/Edwards - We'll open up a carafe of whoopass on terrorists!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder

You bring up another good point... once this backfired on them, it mercifully buried Kitty's cat tail's... now anything else they were saving for their October surprise should pale compared to this mess they're in with forged documents. I can picture them all now sharing a room with Martha.


488 posted on 09/20/2004 9:30:02 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: gswilder
Some are speculating that if this was a concerted effort to bring down Bush with forgeries, why didn't they come up with something more explosive? I believe that this was just the first of many such stories (forgeries)to come out. Remember, that some of CBS experts have stated, they were given many more documents than the 4-6 that we know about.

Why should I believe any docucuments produced by CBS.

500 posted on 09/20/2004 9:38:44 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson