[PittsburghAfterDark]

There should definitely be consequences to their actions from the White House. You obviously can't remove CBS's White House correspondent but this is a valid sanction for their actions.

Mess with the bull, get the horns. CBS has lost all semblance of credibility with this fiasco and they need to continue paying a very public price for their mistake. Murrow is rolling in his grave.

Have you noticed the incredible silence of Walter Cronkite on this issue?

[Quix]

It is a nice double bind for Walter! The old--most-trusted-man-in-America winner. He must have some cognative dissonance to wrestle with.

Still, I expect he'll rationalize and still sleep nights, somehow.

Sigh. Soooooo many Commies, too little will to deal with them, too few bullets.

[UltraKonservativen]

...can't remove CBS's White House correspondent...

And why the hell not? Only REPUTABLE NEWS SOURCES have the right to be correspondents. There is no ENQUIRER correspondent or ULTRKONSERVATIVEN correspondent.
If you can't tell the difference between a hatchet job and a news story, you need to go back to square one (Or RESIGN DAN).

[Real Cynic No More]

You obviously can't remove CBS's White House correspondent...

Please help me to understand, WHY NOT?

[lonevoice]

There should definitely be consequences to their actions from the White House. You obviously can't remove CBS's White House correspondent

Why can't they?

[ClancyJ]

Since when is the president to be questioned by DNC-C BS?

He is to be questioned by a news organization and DNC-C BS forfeited their place as a news site when they starting giving campaign advise and serving as an arm of the DNC.

[Diplomat]

Have you noticed the incredible silence of Walter Cronkite on this issue?

You mean Rather's unimpeachable source?