Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UC eligibility change raises minority protest Regents look at higher GPA standard again
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 9/20/4 | Tanya Schevitz

Posted on 09/20/2004 5:01:27 PM PDT by SmithL

Minority advocates say they will turn out in force at this week's meeting of the University of California Board of Regents in an attempt to kill a proposal they fear will make it harder for black and Latino students to gain admission.

At issue is a faculty recommendation to raise the minimum grade point average from a B- to a B in order to shrink the pool of California high school students eligible to attend one of UC's nine undergraduate campuses.

"The regents must end their sordid practice of shutting their doors to the students of California, especially black and Latino students," said Yvette Felarca, a UC Berkeley graduate student and a national organizer for the pro- affirmative action group, By Any Means Necessary. "If anything, the regents ought to be reversing this kind of trend.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gpa; minority; protest
Who benefits from lower standards?
1 posted on 09/20/2004 5:01:27 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Democrats, of course. :P


2 posted on 09/20/2004 5:02:44 PM PDT by BelegStrongbow (Having a human friend is no bed of roses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Who benefits from lower standards?

According to 'minority advocates', apparently, Blacks and Latinos do. (They probably just forgot to include women and gays.)

3 posted on 09/20/2004 5:09:26 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If I went around tomorrow saying, "Blacks and Latinos just can't hack it and need to be patronized, coddled, and infantilized," I'd be voted off the island for bigotry, yet these idiots make a career out of it. Probably a lot of them have grants that actually pay them to do so. What a system.


4 posted on 09/20/2004 5:09:47 PM PDT by John Jorsett (Kerry-Edwards: FORGING AHEAD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
What a strange argument! They are claiming that it is unfair to screen out inferior candidates if they are black or minority. Strange!

There is a flip side to this. Next Saturday, watch a bunch of college football games. Are the white players being excluded for purely racial reasons? Is there some racial capability that makes black players naturally better than white players? How do we correct that bias? Is there some racial capability that makes white students naturally better than black students? How do we correct that bias?

But, why are the effects of one bias acceptable but the other, not?

5 posted on 09/20/2004 5:20:03 PM PDT by Tacis (Benedict Arnold - It's all about forging documents and selling out America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Standards, Borders, Language, Culture. Any questions?


6 posted on 09/20/2004 6:11:02 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Right makes right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson