Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Peter the Great
NRO ^ | September 20, 2004 | Ion Mihai Pacepa

Posted on 09/20/2004 4:10:21 PM PDT by neverdem

E-mail Author

Send to a Friend

<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%> Print Version


No Peter the Great
Vladimir Putin is in the Andropov mold.

By Ion Mihai Pacepa

Vladimir Putin looks more and more like a heavy-handed imitation of Yuri Andropov — does anyone still remember him? Andropov was that other KGB chairman who rose all the way up to the Kremlin throne, and who was also once my de facto boss. Considering that Putin has inherited upwards of 6,000 suspected strategic nuclear weapons, this is frightening news.

Former KGB officers are now running Russia's government, just as they did during Andropov's reign, and the Kremlin's image — another Andropov specialty — continues to be more important than people's real lives in that still-inscrutable country. The government's recent catastrophic Beslan operation was a reenactment of the effort to "rescue" 2,000 people from Moscow's Dubrovka Theater, where the "new" KGB flooded the hall with fentanyl gas and caused the death of 129 hostages. No wonder Putin ordered Andropov's statue — which had been removed after the Soviet Union's collapse in 1991 — reinstalled at the Lubyanka.

In the West, if Andropov is remembered at all, it is for his brutal suppression of political dissidence at home and for his role in planning the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia. By contrast, the leaders of the former Warsaw Pact intelligence community, when I was one of them, looked up to Andropov as the man who substituted the KGB for the Communist party in governing the Soviet Union, and who was the godfather of Russia's new era of deception operations aimed at improving the badly damaged image of Soviet rulers in the West.

In early 2000, President Putin divided Russia into seven "super" districts, each headed by a "presidential representative," and he gave five of these seven new posts to former KGB officers. Soon, his KGB colleagues occupied nearly 50 percent of the top government positions in Moscow. In a brief interview with Ted Koppel on Nightline, Putin admitted that he had stuffed the Kremlin with former KGB officers, but he said it was because he wanted to root out graft. "I have known them for many years and I trust them. It has nothing to do with ideology. It's simply a matter of their professional qualities and personal relationship."

THE NATIONAL POLITICAL PASTIME

In reality, it's an old Russian tradition to fill the most important governmental positions with undercover intelligence officers. The czarist Okhrana security service planted its agents everywhere: in the central and local government, and in political parties, labor unions, churches, and newspapers. Until 1913, Pravda itself was edited by one of them, Roman Malinovsky, who rose to become Lenin's deputy for Russia and the chairman of the Bolshevik faction in the Duma.

Andropov Sovietized that Russian tradition and extended its application nationwide. It was something similar to militarizing the government in wartime, but it was accomplished by the KGB. In 1972, when he launched this new offensive, KGB Chairman Andropov told me that this would help eliminate the current plague of theft and bureaucratic chaos and would combat the growing sympathy for American jazz, films, and blue jeans obsessing the younger Soviet generation. Andropov's new undercover officers were secretly remunerated with tax-free salary supplements and job promotions. In exchange, Andropov explained, they would secretly have to obey "our" military regulations, practice "our" military discipline and carry out "our" tasks, if they wanted to keep their jobs. Of course, the KGB had long been using diplomatic cover slots for its officers assigned abroad, but Andropov's new approach was designed to influence the Soviet Union itself.

The lines separating the leadership of the country from the intelligence apparatus had blurred in the Soviet satellites as well. After I was granted political asylum in the United States in July 1978, the Western media reported that my defection had unleashed the greatest political purge in the history of Communist Romania. Ceausescu had demoted politburo members, fired one-third of his cabinet, and replaced ambassadors. All were undercover intelligence officers whose military documents and pay vouchers I had regularly signed off on.

THE MAKING OF A DICTATOR

General Aleksandr Sakharovsky, the Soviet gauleiter of Romania who rose to head the Soviet foreign intelligence service for an unprecedented 15 years, used to predict to me that KGB Chairman Andropov would soon have the whole Soviet bloc in his vest pocket, and that he would surely end up in the Kremlin. Andropov would have to wait ten years until Brezhnev died, but on November 12, 1982, he did take up the country's reins. Once settled in the Kremlin, Andropov surrounded himself with KGB officers, who immediately went on a propaganda offensive to introduce him to the West as a "moderate" Communist and a sensitive, warm, Western-oriented man who allegedly enjoyed an occasional drink of Scotch, liked to read English novels, and loved listening to American jazz and the music of Beethoven. In actual fact, Andropov did not drink, as he was already terminally ill from a kidney disorder, and the rest of the portrayal was equally false.

In 1999, when Putin became prime minister, he also surrounded himself with KGB officers, who began describing him as a "Europeanized" leader — capitalizing, ironically, on the fact that he had been a KGB spy abroad. Yet Putin's only foreign experience had been in East Germany, on Moscow's side of the Berlin Wall. Soon after that I visited the Stasi headquarters in Leipzig and Dresden to see where Putin had spent his "Europeanizing" years. Local representatives of the Gauck Commission — a special post-Communism German panel researching the Stasi files — said that the "Soviet-German 'friendship house'" Putin headed for six years was actually a KGB front with operational offices at the Leipzig and Dresden Stasi headquarters. Putin's real task was to recruit East German engineers as KGB agents and send them to the West to steal American technologies.

I visited those offices and found that they looked just like the offices of my own midlevel case officers in regional Securitate directorates in Romania. Yet Moscow claims Putin had held an important job in East Germany and was decorated by the East German government. The Gauck Commission confirmed that Putin was decorated in 1988 "for his KGB work in the East German cities of Dresden and Leipzig." According to the West German magazine Der Spiegel, he received a bronze medal from the East German Stasi as a "typical representative of second-rank agents." There, in those prison-like buildings, cut off even from real East German life by Stasi guards with machine guns and police dogs, Lieutenant Colonel Putin could not possibly have become the modern-day, Western-oriented Peter the Great that the Kremlin's propaganda machine is so energetically spinning.

Indeed, on December 20, 1999, Russia's newly appointed prime minister visited the Lubyanka to deliver a speech on this "memorable day," commemorating Lenin's founding of the first Soviet political police, the Cheka. "Several years ago we fell prey to the illusion that we have no enemies," Putin told a meeting of top security officials. "We have paid dearly for this. Russia has its own national interests, and we have to defend them." The following day, December 21, 1999, another "memorable day" in Soviet history — Stalin's 120th birthday — Putin organized a closed-door reception in his Kremlin office reported as being for the politicians who had won seats in the Duma. There he raised a glass to good old Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili (Stalin, meaning "man of steel," was the dictator's nom de guerre).

Days later, in a 14-page article entitled "Russia on the Threshold of a New Millennium," Putin defined Russia's new "democratic" future: "The state must be where and as needed; freedom must be where and as required." The Chechens' effort to regain their independence was mere "terrorism," and he pledged to eradicate it: "We'll get them anywhere — if we find terrorists sitting in the outhouse, then we will piss on them there. The matter is settled." It is not.

SCAPEGOATING AND CONSOLIDATING

On September 9, 2004, Chechen nationalists announced a $20 million prize on the head of the "war criminal" Vladimir Putin, whom they accuse of "murdering hundreds of thousands of peaceful civilians on the territory of Chechnya, including tens of thousands of children."

For his part, President Putin tried to divert the outrage over the horrific Breslan catastrophe away from his KGB colleagues who had caused it, and to direct public anger toward the KGB's archenemy, the U.S. Citing meetings of mid-level U.S. officials with Chechen leaders, Putin accused Washington of having a double standard when dealing with terrorism. "Why don't you meet Osama bin Laden, invite him to Brussels or to the White House and engage in talks, ask him what he wants and give it to him so he leaves you in peace?" Putin told reporters in Moscow.

Then Putin blamed the collapse of the Soviet Union for what he called a "full scale" terrorist war against Russia and started taking Soviet-style steps to strengthen the Kremlin's power. On September 13, he announced measures to eliminate the election of the country's governors, who should now be appointed by the Kremlin, and to allow only "certified" people — that is, former KGB officers — to run for the parliament.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, its people had a unique opportunity to cast out their political police, a peculiarly Russian instrument of power that has for centuries isolated their country from the real world and in the end left them ill-equipped to deal with the complexities of modern society. Unfortunately, up until then most Russians had never owned property, had never experienced a free-market economy, and had never made decisions for themselves. Under Communism they were taught to despise Western democracy and everything they believed to be connected with capitalism, e.g., free enterprise, decision-making, hard work, risk-taking, and social inequality. Moreover, the Russians had also had minimal experience with real political parties, since their country has been a police state since the 16th century. To them, it seemed easier to continue the tradition of the political police state than to take the risk of starting everything anew.

But the times have changed dramatically. My native country, which borders Russia, is a good example. At first, Romania's post-Communism rulers, for whom managing the country with the help of the political police was the only form of government they had ever known, bent over backwards to preserve the KGB-created Securitate, a criminal organization that became the symbol of Communist tyranny in the West. Article 27 of Romania's 1990 law for organizing the new intelligence services stated that only former Securitate officers "who have been found guilty of crimes against fundamental human rights and against freedom" could not be employed in the "new" intelligence services. In other words, only Ceausescu would not have been eligible for employment there. Today, Romania still has the same president as in 1990, but his country is now a member of NATO and is helping the U.S. to rid the world of Cold War-style dictators and the terrorism they generated.

Russia can also break with its Communist past and join our fight against despots and terrorists. We can help them do it, but first we should have a clear understanding of what is now going on behind the veil of secrecy that still surrounds the Kremlin.

Ion Mihai Pacepa, a former two-star general, is the highest-ranking intelligence officer to have defected from the Soviet bloc. His book Red Horizons has been republished in 27 countries.

 

     


 

 
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/pacepa200409200814.asp
     



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: andropov; ionmihaipacepa; putin; vladimirputin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-234 next last
To: MarMema
Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin Speak out Against Putin’s Reforms ^
  Posted by MarMema to StoneFury
On News/Activism ^ 09/17/2004 1:12:58 AM EDT · 148 of 383 ^

but *I* am going to sit back and watch the fireworks as Putin flattens Chechnya.

I will bring the popcorn.

~~~~~

Tell me..would Christ share your popcorn and your obvious glee at the mass murder of God's children?

Where is Christ in YOUR posts?


141 posted on 09/21/2004 8:09:58 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

To: Luis Gonzalez
A Russia who supplied weapons and technology to Saddam Hussein before and AFTER the US invasion of Iraq is the enemy of the US.

Not just Iraq but also Afghanistan. And the mayor of Russia was furious that the butchers at Beslan had new Russian weapons. Corroption is very serious there. Putin is trying to eliminate it. Your finger is pointed in the wrong direction.

143 posted on 09/21/2004 8:11:15 AM PDT by MarMema (next year in constantinople!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

corroption = corruption


144 posted on 09/21/2004 8:12:35 AM PDT by MarMema (next year in constantinople!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

LOL!!

Putin was too inept to stop the massive sales and exportation of arms from his ports to Iraq...but you just think that he is soooooo wonderful.


145 posted on 09/21/2004 8:13:23 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

So, Putin did what any dictator would do...he punished the innocent and left the guilty alone.

He took from innocent Russians the ability to vote, while doing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to identify and incarcerate or fine those "private" Russian companies who sold arms and technologies to America's enemies.


146 posted on 09/21/2004 8:15:36 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
To: FreeReign
Now tell me why should Chechnya be flattened if 75% of the country voted for the Putin guy, Alkaholicov?

Because it is a portal to Hades.

189 posted on 09/17/2004 1:52:31 AM EDT by MarMema

147 posted on 09/21/2004 8:16:31 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
No I think he has a lot of work on his hands, but in hard times you have to do your best. Russia elected him overwhelmingly and he is a far cry better than Yeltsin.

Terrorism is a tough war to fight. We just had an American beheaded yesterday, or the tape released.

Putin went on tv to admit his mistake in not seeing the extent of the corruption. And made a public apology to his people after Nord-Ost.

148 posted on 09/21/2004 8:17:06 AM PDT by MarMema (next year in constantinople!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Destro; A. Pole
The government's recent catastrophic Beslan operation was a reenactment of the effort to "rescue" 2,000 people from Moscow's Dubrovka Theater, where the "new" KGB flooded the hall with fentanyl gas and caused the death of 129 hostages.

First it was around 800 people. Lets get figures straight if credibility of any sort is to be achieved. Now, considering an 80% survival rate in a no win situation, that is not bad. I will say this for the record, as my father taught me: do not criticize unless you have a better solution. I for one do not and neither have I seen one from any one of the legion of critics who have come marching through.

Then again, these are almost all the same critics that assault Bush on Iraq damning him for any success and offering no better solutions. As we do not accept such shoddy journalism on our own soldier and their sacrifices to save as many as possible, neither should we accept it of our allies and pseudo allies.

Remember one thing: the Left (both here and abroad) loves Islam (I have yet to figure this out in its totality) and will do anything to split the allies (yes our own are our worst enemies in our very own war of survival...sick isn't it?) and pseudo allies and focus them on criticizing and fighting each other rather then the Islamofacists that the socialist/communist shill and whore for.

149 posted on 09/21/2004 8:23:06 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
There is a legion of these ex-KGB types here in America. Each is trying to capitalize on their former careers or there lack off to make a tidy sum, most are successful. Case in point: Newsmax's Col Stanislav Lunov. He "defected" from the Soviet Union in 1993, came to the US, wrote a book on how the soviet union in shadows was preparing to attack the US on Y2K and Newsmax pimped him and his book. Funny, 2004 and no invasion.
150 posted on 09/21/2004 8:26:02 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Can you provide proof that the KGB did not in fact cause the massacre?

I'm sorry but the US justice system does not work that way. The accusor must provide proof of guilt, not the defender proof of innocense. If you through the accusation, prove that it happened beyond reasonable doubt. Otherwise you are on the same level as the french best seller that the pentagon blew up itself.

151 posted on 09/21/2004 8:28:08 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Funny, did not the US government accept that Chechins did it? So you are either with Bush on this or you are with Kerry and against Bush, I wonder which one it is? With Bush in recognizing Chechin terrorism and Al Quida membership or with Kerry in avoiding, explaining, shifting blame...how conservative some are. :)


152 posted on 09/21/2004 8:32:32 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
In order to end terrorism, the reasons for the terrorism existing must be eliminated; if they are not, then we will fight an endless, nearly unwinable war.

Your words ring so true, why I hear them on all our alphabet networks, day in and day out. Those are the exact words used to condemn our president and promote sKerry.

153 posted on 09/21/2004 8:43:17 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: jb6
"I'm sorry but the US justice system does not work that way."

I'm sorry, I thought I was posting on an online political opinion blog, not testifying in Court.

I will however introduce my first piece of evidence:

Gas 'killed Moscow hostages'
Almost all the 117 hostages who were killed when Russian troops stormed a Moscow theatre on Saturday died from gas poisoning, it has been admitted.

Only one of those held for three days by Chechen rebels died of gunshot wounds, said Andrei Seltsovsky, chairman of the health committee of the city of Moscow." -- Source

It's the Russian style of getting things done.

154 posted on 09/21/2004 8:47:54 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: jb6

God...Kerry has no interest in defeating terrorism or the source of terrorism, he wants to retreat.

I don't think you actually understand what I've said.


155 posted on 09/21/2004 8:49:33 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: jb6

Bush is highly critical of Putin's moves in Chechnya and in Russia, try reading an actual newspaper on occasion.

You are siding with a guy who sides with Al Gore and Justin Raimondo on this issue.


156 posted on 09/21/2004 8:51:50 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez ( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Only one of those held for three days by Chechen rebels died of gunshot wounds,

So you accept the fact that, contrary to every piece of evidence of every hostage situation in the past 5 years, that the jihaders were planning on releasing these people and not blowing them up? By your logic the heros of the 4th plane on 911 should have sat still and waited to be released. And all those hostages held by jihaders in Iraq, none of them have anything to worry about either. Or do you go against President Bush and not accept his statements that these terrorists were evil?

157 posted on 09/21/2004 9:01:16 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth = Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
It's simply amazing that people in this forum are so willing to embrace the rebirth of totalitarianism in Russia with such fervor.

I think that many of the Putin defenders have Russian ties themselves. I recall once reading the theory that Russians pine for a harsh, ruthless leader. Apparently there is a word for this type of leader in Russian, which I won't attempt to present in Cyrillic font, but which is pronounced something like "hozain". This trend of masochistic psychology goes back to the days of serfdom.

158 posted on 09/21/2004 9:11:01 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Indie

See post #101 -


159 posted on 09/21/2004 9:41:01 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

You used the present tense - since America did not bomb Russia and the only ones being the Chechens then it is clear - you slipped up - Freudian slipped your true position.


160 posted on 09/21/2004 9:42:42 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-234 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson