Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
My understanding is that the Harriers crash rate had a lot to do with unbalanced thrust vectoring and the fatal roll that this created on landing.

Much of the problem was sorted out. When the Harrier first leapt onto the scene computers could send little white blobs around in a game of quasi-tennis but not much more. As the Harrier was around for longer, it could be fitted with computer systems which allowed much better management of the thrust, and thus far better safety.
36 posted on 09/20/2004 2:34:06 PM PDT by tjwmason (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: tjwmason
Most of the Harrier problems were sorted out with the AV-8B. More powerful engine & avionics plus a greater percentage of composite technology in the airframe.

You also can't compare accident rates of single-engine and dual-engine fighter aircraft. The former will always be higher, for obvious reasons. So far all STOVL jet fighters are single-engine.

38 posted on 09/20/2004 2:50:30 PM PDT by Tallguy (If the Kerry campaign implodes any further, they'll reach the point of "singularity" by election day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson