Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: woodb01
Worse, Staudt, in an Oct 10, 2000 George Magazine issue which went through these same charges, denied them explicitly. (The George Magazine article repeats the charge that Barnes was influenced the TANG for Bush.)

However, the DNC, in a Kerry-Edwards archived press release on April 27, 2004, repeats (word-for-word the same AFM35-13 references and the same charges of disobeying an order that Burkett says he wrote. But the DNC press release claims Staudt, not Barnes, was influencing the TANG on Bush's behalf.

So, not only is Dan Rather recycling old stories against Pres Bush, he can't even get the old stories straight.
54 posted on 09/20/2004 9:11:09 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE

And the rest of the media were perfectly prepared to run with it and ignore the numerous stories on record refuting it like they always ignore the state of the record in favor of dem spin.

They only picked up the ball on this story when the forgery aspect was crystal clear to everyone.


58 posted on 09/20/2004 9:57:20 AM PDT by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson