Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Net security threats growing fast
BBC News | Technology ^ | 9/20/04 | BBC News

Posted on 09/20/2004 5:30:58 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: GBA
I get them too. But I don't worry about them or any other possibly malicious emails.

"Why is that Bloody Sam?" you may be asking yourself.
I use and recommend that everyone use Mailwasher.

It allows you to access and view your email while it is still on your ISPs server before you download it to your PC. It is invaluable and a great piece of software that has saved my bacon many a time.

21 posted on 09/20/2004 6:45:33 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (If you decide to kick the tiger in the ass...you'd better be prepared to deal with the teeth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Well, it looks like those of you still on the windows treadmill have some new post-sp2 Security flaws found that you'll be patching for. From reading the article, the default install exposes all shared files/printers to the the world (with the "firewall" engaged mind you).

Ah, the smug feeling of satisfaction you get from running Linux....

22 posted on 09/20/2004 6:46:36 AM PDT by zeugma (If the gov. =must= assign me a number, it could at least be prime. How about 10980432398542099813?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Forward them, with full header, to abuse@yahoo.com. Yahoo is, by and large, REALLY good about following up with abuse complaints.
23 posted on 09/20/2004 7:08:52 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace (Michael <a href = "http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Bookmarking - need to send this to a friend


24 posted on 09/20/2004 8:44:18 AM PDT by TruthNtegrity ("No man works harder for his money than he who marries it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Bump


25 posted on 09/20/2004 12:20:40 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Users of DSL services are also affected, if a firewall is not integrated into the DSL modem or a common modem instead of a DSL router is used. Additionally, Internet Connection Sharing of the PC has to be disabled.

I don't use file and printer sharing or the windows ICS on my wireless network, and both my DSL and wireless routers have firewalls, in addition to a non-windows software firewall on each machine, and MAC filtering and WPA security enabled.

I'm no expert, but this article appears to be referring to Windows' default network configuration, with only the built-in Windows firewall installed. Anyone who goes with a default windows network config is asking for trouble -- a fact that's been known for years.

I don't think anyone really expected that would change with SP2, and to rely solely on a software firewall created by Microsoft is also asking for trouble.

I would bet the biggest uptick in compromised home computers will be due to wireless networks, a hot item for the back-to-school crowd this year. Most of these are sold without security features turned on, and the average user doesn't have a clue that they're broadcasting personal info to the world. I have a neighbor that uses his name as the broadcast ID, for instance -- it doesn't get much dumber than that.

26 posted on 09/20/2004 12:57:24 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55

Spyware Stormer will get it all on each scan.$29.95 0ne time charge.


27 posted on 09/20/2004 1:05:45 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell (If God had intended Kerry to be our President, we would all have sh*t for brains too!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All
Everyone should have a hardware firewall as well as a software one. I run Norton Internet Security (Firewall & Anti-virus Bundle) and have a Linksys Router with a built in hardware firewall. I have not seen any hits on the Norton in ages. The hardware firewall catches just about every kind of automated attack. I haven’t had a virus in ages except for one incident which probably wasn’t a real virus but a problem with Norton thinking a certain program was infected.

As for spyware, I use SpywareZapper (Costa a one time fee) and it finds and removes stuff that Spybot and AdAware miss. It even removed a real annoying program called “Purity Scan” off of my dad’s computer when nothing else would do it. Also, it got rid of another tough piece of spyware called “Wild Tangent” off of my computer which showed up thanks to the newest version of AOL Instant Messenger.

28 posted on 09/20/2004 1:16:22 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Hannity Was Right, FReepers Tend To Eat Their Own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browardchad
Anyone who goes with a default windows network config is asking for trouble -- a fact that's been known for years.

Known by most geeks, few others. The masses will hear "firewall" and if they recognise the word at all will think it makes them safe. This is a real configuration problem. Personally, I'd know never to accept a default microsoft configuration if I had any windows computers to protect, as microsoft knows jack about security, but many people continue to trust them for reasons I don't fully understand.

You're quite right about the security issues with wireless networks. They are going to continue to be security nightmares. People think computers are like toasters, when they actually require more care and feeding than the average automobile. I wouldn't really care about it so much, and just be content using a computer that just works without hassles, but I'm definitely affected by the spam and raw network consumption from those who do not.

My wireless network uses full crypto, does not broadcast, and is tied to the MAC addresses of my wireless NICs. Unfortunately, this is not the configuration out of the box.

29 posted on 09/20/2004 1:19:47 PM PDT by zeugma (If the gov. =must= assign me a number, it could at least be prime. How about 10980432398542099813?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
My wireless network uses full crypto, does not broadcast, and is tied to the MAC addresses of my wireless NICs.

I do the same. Unfortunately, that's not quite enough.

I left a laptop running kismet on the couch for three months to see what it would dig up. My wireless network is fairly busy, and in all of that time the laptop only came up with ONE "interesting" packet. That's not nearly enough to crack a key, but I'm still using 40 bit cards because they're (a) cheap and (b) supported.

So I change my keys every two months, just to be sure. Use hexadecimal keys only, no names or words that can be looked up in a dictionary.

30 posted on 09/20/2004 10:12:23 PM PDT by TechJunkYard (http://scaryjohnkerry.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson