Hmmm? Could this be construed as insider trading? Dumping his stock because he was aware of the forgeries and the consequences to stock value upon public disclosure.
Beat the rush and dump now
I question the timing.
He can do it and be legal as long as he was acting on publically-available information. Only if he was acting on information known to company insiders but not to the public has he done any wrong.
--- It is interesting to note that an average hurricane causes some 1.5-2.0 billion in damage.
In just a week, Dan Rather's hatred of George Bush, and George Bush's family, has cost American stockholders, American retirees, and American businesses the same damage that a hurricane yields.
Perhaps even more - Significant drops in Viacom stock influence the indexes and averages in all stocks - thus affecting hundreds of millions of other investment yields, insurance yields, and retirement accounts.
Following that logic, it could be said that ANYBODY who sold stock since the story broke has been cheated by Dan Rather, and the executives covering up for him and stonewalling at CBS.