Replies

1 posted on 09/19/2004 7:46:28 AM PDT by stevek1

"If Kerry is elected, we wouldn't send troops either," the unnamed [cowardly French] official told the New York Daily News. "We don't need any more targets in Iraq."

Since 1940, France hasn't seen fit the send troop to fight anyone other than GreenPeace...

I stand corrected -- they sent troops to Viet Nam for a bit back in the 50s -- only to have their yellow arses handed back to them on a silver platter (sans garnish)

28 posted on 09/19/2004 1:51:49 PM PDT by F16Fighter

This takes 50% of sKerry's allies out of the picture. The poodle said he would get more "allies" to help. He means France and Germany, he is wrong and France knows it.

So the French want GW to carry the load and they are undercutting sKerry.

Cool...

29 posted on 09/19/2004 1:56:00 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So (Some days I am more rednecked than other days. Not there is anything wrong with that.)

Donate to Swift Boat Vets for the Truth HERE.
Sign Petition against CBS & Dan Rather HERE.
My Campaign Button Page
and My Toons Page [Updated 9-18 / 6:20PM CST]

30 posted on 09/19/2004 2:01:23 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)

As if this was news to anyone who had been paying attention.

32 posted on 09/19/2004 2:30:18 PM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)

I said this on a mirror posting of this thread, but I think it bears repeating here.

If Kerry gets elected, he'll go in with the exit strategy that he'll magically whip up support from foreign nations that will take over for him. obviously, we know that's not what's going to happen.

What will happen is that Kerry won't have a back-up exit strategy. As a matter of fact, he won't have a strategy whatsoever. As a result, the "second Vietnam" liberals claim that we are in now will be actualized, and Kerry will be left sitting there without a plausible way to withdraw. As the situation advances, and concerns at home regarding troop shortages increase, the Democrats might institute a draft. Democrats don't have the sense to realize that drafted troops are not nearly the same quality as voluntary troops.

Point made simple? If Iraq is to be preserved and our troops are to be properly supported, and if we don't want to see a draft in our future to support a war that Kerry neither knows how to fight nor withdraw from, then we'd better ramp up support for Bush and pray to God Kerry doesn't even get close to the Oval Office.

35 posted on 09/20/2004 1:04:06 PM PDT by William Martel (Anyone But Kerry in 2004.)

36 posted on 09/20/2004 1:05:03 PM PDT by katana

But...Kerry promised a REAL coalition, not that phony one Bush came up with...the one with all those dirty Brits, Italians, Polish and Japanese...

37 posted on 09/20/2004 1:09:34 PM PDT by cake_crumb (The Kerry Kampaign Has Waffle Marks All Over It)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794