There's a non-sequitur here. A more likely conclusion is that you're cheap, lazy, and unreasonable. :)
I did hear one interview she did on Fox News in which she mentioned her dad called her after the first interview and wasn't happy with her
That's fair. The last time I looked noone had bothered to actually track down the daughter. So now there are more complications - a dispute between father and daughter. Didn't that happen with the Reagans? Don't most families have "issues"?
unless, of course, the people at Fox have adopted the CBS code of journalistic ethics
For me this is a childish and partisan slant, an overreaction. CBS got it wrong this time (most probably). So what? That doesn't mean they get everything wrong. They're partisan. How many times do you want to prove it? Everyone has blind spots and biases and the truth is hard to come by.
Viacom may need to hire a replacement for Dan Rather soon. Judging from your kneejerk liberal insults, you have a good shot at taking over the anchor chair.
Just like Dan, you've got issues, boy. So long, and have a nice day in LiberalLand.
It isn't surprising to you that CBS continues to stick with their original story, even after their fraud has been long-exposed?