Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JPJones
"In a debate this heated, one can hardly expect Gen. Staudt to endorse the point of view that he exerted undue influence."

She's basically calling Staudt a liar.

Sooner or later, this is going to make him mad enough to take to the airways.

27 posted on 09/18/2004 12:19:12 AM PDT by Howlin (What's the Font Spacing, Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

That's what I'm hoping, that the assault on his character,for that's what this is no matter how many euphemisms they use,will make him mad enough to speak out and show them once and for all for the partisan liars that they are. I would think that questioning his integrity like this after he's stated that he didn't exert undue influence,would make a lot of military people mad on his behalf.


32 posted on 09/18/2004 12:52:06 AM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Hey, Howlin!

Did you hit Effin with this ball with your name on it?!


(Is he growing donkey teeth just in time for the election?)

55 posted on 09/18/2004 3:39:07 AM PDT by Timeout (Proud, card-carrying member of JAMMIE NATION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
She's basically calling Staudt a liar.

I know,it's unbelievable. She's decided the truth of the story before even interviewing the key people involved...sheeesshhh.

103 posted on 09/18/2004 7:37:34 AM PDT by JPJones ("We'll cross all our tee's and dot all our.....lower case j's")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson