Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedOhio

Michael Medved


3 posted on 09/17/2004 8:19:24 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc

Medved is best for serious talk. Not the most entertaining but he is extremely knowledgable. Savage is great but he's too schizophrenic to be taken too seriously. Phil Hendrie is definitly the most entertaining though.


25 posted on 09/17/2004 8:23:22 PM PDT by TechnicalEcstacy (Ann Coulter - want to touch the heiny - aaoowwwooo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: quidnunc

Yep, Medved going away, although he lacks nuance on Muslim religion and Muslim country issues. But he engages the opposing point of view, and gives it some airtime, better than anybody in the business. His mind is like a Swiss watch. Al Rantel, the hardline gay conservative, is also incredibly informed and articulate, but not so good at engaging in something of a dialog with opponents, and causing them to self shred.


43 posted on 09/17/2004 8:26:22 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson