Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Hank All-American
The patient died, but the operation was a success.
2 posted on
09/17/2004 4:59:43 PM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Hank All-American
3 posted on
09/17/2004 5:00:07 PM PDT by
nuconvert
(Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film.)
To: Hank All-American
It's called desperation....
4 posted on
09/17/2004 5:00:19 PM PDT by
Keith in Iowa
(At CBS - "We don't just report news - we make it - up.")
To: Hank All-American
Dean's former campaign Manager just mentioned a "theory" he heard that the documents were actually made in 1972, but were later scanned, changing the font. LMAOROTFPMP
5 posted on
09/17/2004 5:00:34 PM PDT by
bad company
(What's the font kenneth?)
To: Hank All-American
Kerry's separation papers were scanned, adding a V device to his Silver Star.
6 posted on
09/17/2004 5:01:08 PM PDT by
VadeRetro
To: Hank All-American
This is just a theory but I have heard from many people that GWB had more than 375 hours flying F 102's!
7 posted on
09/17/2004 5:01:26 PM PDT by
rocksblues
(Sorry John, we remember and will never forget your treason!)
To: Hank All-American
Exactly how does "scanning" a document "change its font"? Also mysterious is how the signature (which is supposedly authentic according to CBS's "handwriting expert", right?) somehow survived this spooky "scanning" process.
These guys just won't let go of their delusions.
To: Hank All-American
LOL...Scanning is the same thing as copying of faxing. It just takes a pic of the doc. It doesn't change spacing. What a maroon.
To: Hank All-American
Then how does he explain all of the factual errors and incorrect dates?
And did this scanner come with the Microsoft Word '72?
10 posted on
09/17/2004 5:02:29 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
To: Hank All-American
oh yeah, my scanner even changes words sometimes!
11 posted on
09/17/2004 5:02:32 PM PDT by
knak
To: Hank All-American
Dean's former campaign Manager just mentioned a "theory" he heard that the documents were actually made in 1972, but were later scanned, changing the font. Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.
To: Hank All-American
You would have to scan the documents using ocr software and it would need to be a perfect read - other wise you would be changing parts of the original text.
That begs the question, still, where are the originals then? *gasp*
Could it be that there are NO originals?
Oh never mind that the entire story has been blown to bits by living people. Oh wait, forgot, the DNC relies on dead people to vote and cover their stories anyways.
To: Hank All-American
Hey, Trippi, how about this as a theory: THEY'RE FRAUDS!
14 posted on
09/17/2004 5:04:00 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
To: Hank All-American
These bastards need to be taught a lesson by the American folk!! When is Harkins reelection date? That clymer can NOT get away with his vicious false vile accusation he did against W on the assertion of those fake docs! PLEASE FREEPERS DON'T LET THIS A#$hole get away with what he did!! Let's mobilize to kick him outta office next...FIRST, da#$hole than Harkins!!
To: Hank All-American
Dean's former campaign Manager just mentioned a "theory" he heard that the documents were actually made in 1972, but were later scanned, changing the font. And I just heard a "theory" that the Earth is flat.
To: Hank All-American
Is he talking about some OCR scan of the documents? Here's my question . . . WHY? Again it's the same thing with these morons. They think that because soemone COULD do a thing that that means that possibility can't be closed off. It doesn't matter how ridiculous or how easily it can be demonstrated just how remote or implausible these things are they'll cling to it. It's PATHETIC, is it not?
23 posted on
09/17/2004 5:07:32 PM PDT by
jayef
To: Hank All-American
has he been slumming on du again?
24 posted on
09/17/2004 5:07:34 PM PDT by
tioga
To: Hank All-American
Dean's former campaign Manager just mentioned a "theory" he heard that the documents were actually made in 1972, but were later scanned, changing the font.And my wife, Morgan Fairchild, did the actual scanning. Yeah...that's the ticket.
26 posted on
09/17/2004 5:08:20 PM PDT by
ILS21R
To: Hank All-American
They're going down for the third time.
28 posted on
09/17/2004 5:08:57 PM PDT by
atomicpossum
(If there are two Americas, John Edwards isn't qualified to lead either of them.©)
To: Hank All-American
Dean's former campaign Manager just mentioned a "theory" he heard that the documents were actually made in 1972, but were later scanned, changing the font. Scanners can't change fonts, this is ridiculous
Holy crap, now the LA Times is going to expose me too.
31 posted on
09/17/2004 5:09:49 PM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(CBS, admit defeat and bow to the pajamahadeen)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson