The "study" is almost entirely unproven theory, based on numerous assumptions that have yet to be validated.
However, the paper has yet to be peer-reviewed, and errors in his assumptions could undermine his theory. Furthermore, he acknowledged that real-world considerations could easily skew his conclusions.
So for those of you that live in a fantasy world, I'm sure this kind of thing is perfectly acceptible.
Those of us that live in the real world figure this is just another puff of vapor.
Are you really sure you aren't a CBS fact checker?