[Warren_Piece]

I think you're being unfair, calling those who were sceptical "DU trollers". I had a moment of doubt during the 2nd Beck interview. Keep in mind that up till that moment I had been in the foreforont of pushing this story. I've seen enough now to be relatively certain that this wasn't a hoax.

Considering all the angles is not trolling, it's strengthening your agrument. Think of all the vetting we did over the Rather memos!

[capocchio]

relatively certain that this wasn't a hoax.

It would seem that the union president apologizing proves it was not a hoax.

As for all those who doubted Parlock, I think everyone owes him and his family an apology. If people wish to be skeptical, that's fine, but they should not say things to hurt the family while they are making up their minds. The union caused this family enough hurt without FR pseudo detectives causing more collateral damage.

The trolls became pied pipers, rather successful ones at that. I hoped we might be smarter.