Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS CONCERN OVER VIEWERSHIP PLUNGE; RATHER RATINGS FADE IN MAJOR MARKETS
DrudgeReport ^ | SEPT 16, 2004

Posted on 09/16/2004 12:23:38 PM PDT by NCjim

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
"The audience appears to [be] polarized," a top CBS source said from LOS ANGELES on Thursday. "Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist... of course we do not like to see the ratings coming back the way they are this week."

Double duh...

1 posted on 09/16/2004 12:23:38 PM PDT by NCjim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NCjim

Gee, what did they think would happen? Boggles the mind.


2 posted on 09/16/2004 12:24:44 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

I never watched CBS News but I did watch some CBS programs.

No more CSI or Raymond for me.


3 posted on 09/16/2004 12:25:45 PM PDT by USA_Soccer (Try a better (free + open source) browser -> Mozilla Firefox @ mozilla.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
They should be happy, they got me as a viewer for two days this week, after this story broke.

But I'm bored already, so back to FOX.

4 posted on 09/16/2004 12:25:52 PM PDT by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton

Meanwhile, traffic to conservative blogs is surging.

Yesterday PoliPundit.com had over 32,000 unique visitors, a new record.

Instapundit.com had over 440,000 pageviews yesterday.


5 posted on 09/16/2004 12:28:17 PM PDT by USA_Soccer (Try a better (free + open source) browser -> Mozilla Firefox @ mozilla.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Executives fear many voters inclined to vote for Bush are now switching off Rather

How can we switch off what we never watch?
6 posted on 09/16/2004 12:28:48 PM PDT by secret garden (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

But how do these numbers compare against last week?


7 posted on 09/16/2004 12:29:23 PM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

The quote you pulled is the key, the top source must be named Clueless Maximus.


8 posted on 09/16/2004 12:29:24 PM PDT by Packer Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
LOL and what was it some of the sponsors said to Freepers who contacted them! Wonder if they are rethinking their positions now...LMAO

OH Happy Day!
9 posted on 09/16/2004 12:30:44 PM PDT by Repub4bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

"And folks, this means that those ratings are lower than Britney Spears' beltline . . ."


10 posted on 09/16/2004 12:31:33 PM PDT by mywholebodyisaweapon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Already posted.


CBSNEWS EXECS CONCERN OVER VIEWERSHIP PLUNGE; RATHER RATINGS FADE IN MAJOR MARKETS  ^
  Posted by Rutles4Ever
On News/Activism ^ 09/16/2004 11:14:29 AM EDT · 297 replies · 12,810+ views


The Drudge Report ^ | 9/16/2004 | Matt Drudge

11 posted on 09/16/2004 12:32:03 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Already posted.


CBSNEWS EXECS CONCERN OVER VIEWERSHIP PLUNGE; RATHER RATINGS FADE IN MAJOR MARKETS  ^
  Posted by Rutles4Ever
On News/Activism ^ 09/16/2004 11:14:29 AM EDT · 297 replies · 12,810+ views


The Drudge Report ^ | 9/16/2004 | Matt Drudge

12 posted on 09/16/2004 12:32:04 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

This reminds me of the movie "the contender" but ala hollywood style , it was republicans going after dems. It was the story of a VP candidate who was a woman who has supposed pictures of her being used by many men in college. She refused to answer the allegation even though the pictures were frauds and the story was wrong , even though they had witnesses. At the end of the movie , she was asked , if it was all untrue why not answer the allegation and clear your name, she responded , because they had no right to ask the question. Guess what Dan Rather , Pres Bush doesn't answer the allegation because you have no right to ask the question!!!!!


13 posted on 09/16/2004 12:32:29 PM PDT by robjna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mywholebodyisaweapon

The Dan Rather fraud is simply the last straw...


14 posted on 09/16/2004 12:32:58 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

I have been singing the "happy happy joy joy " song for the last couple of days.

I watched him lie his way through Vietnam, watergate, Iran-contra for 30 years and am enjoying this "big Time"


15 posted on 09/16/2004 12:33:09 PM PDT by underbyte (Arrogance will drop your IQ 50 points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA_Soccer

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/

Visitors Yesterday
Total: 260,792
Unique: 191,858


16 posted on 09/16/2004 12:33:57 PM PDT by USA_Soccer (Try a better (free + open source) browser -> Mozilla Firefox @ mozilla.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NCjim
Rather [...] also pulled less audience than reruns of the SIMPSONS,

D'oh!
Eat my dust, Danny boy!

17 posted on 09/16/2004 12:35:12 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

bump


18 posted on 09/16/2004 12:35:30 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! NOV 2, 2004 is VETERANS DAY! VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

"polarized" indicates people falling on either side of a question. The audience isn't "polarized." They are SICK of your lies and they are ALL siding against CBS. They can't even tell the truth in this.


19 posted on 09/16/2004 12:35:38 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NCjim

"The audience appears to [be] polarized," a top CBS source said from LOS ANGELES on Thursday. "Rightly or wrongly, we're being perceived as 'anti-Bush,' which I do not think is fair to Dan, who is a fine journalist... of course we do not like to see the ratings coming back the way they are this week."

But Dan Rather IS Anti-Bush. His "investigative reporting" tells us this is so. Why is being fair to Dan even a consideration? Fair is just a 4-letter 'F' word. This source and Rather are typical liberals...they expect to have it both ways. Well...not anymore.


20 posted on 09/16/2004 12:36:53 PM PDT by truthseeker2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson