Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski
From what I've seen John Roberts has no vendetta against the Bush family, which is what drives Dan Rather. Dan has shown almost a dedication to going anti-Bush. I've tried to figure out why...perhaps some story he was denied by Bush 1....but who knows?
21 posted on 09/16/2004 8:20:21 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

John Roberts is a Dan Rather wannabe. He kisses Rather's butt, has great hair and he's Canadian so I guess that gives him the credentials to anchor.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1216840/posts?page=11#1

John Roberts presumed that Bush should take CBS's memos seriously, complaining: "The President has yet to weigh in on new documents about his National Guard record made public last week by 60 Minutes." After an audio clip of First Lady Laura Bush saying the memos supposedly written by Jerry Killian "probably are forgeries," Roberts, though every day another news outline undermines CBS's claims, had the temerity to lecture: "However, Laura Bush offered no evidence to back up her claim, and CBS News continues to stand by its reporting."

Roberts also highlighted how Democrats rolled "out a new Internet ad highlighting unanswered questions challenging him to clear the air." Following a clip of a Guardsman at the convention who defended Bush's record, Roberts highlighted a disgruntled brother of a Guardsman, who was killed in Iraq, who claimed his brother died because Bush lied: "For the families of some Guard members, it's not the past that's important, it's the present. Sergeant Sherwood Baker was killed in Baghdad April 26th -- betrayed, his brother claimed today, by a President who went to war on a lie."

Roberts concluded by showing that CBS News is in sync with Democrats: "Democrats plan to keep the issue alive, fighting what they see as an attempt by the Bush campaign to turn the focus from the questions to those asking them."


64 posted on 09/16/2004 8:33:44 AM PDT by Republican Red (We're going to win one for the gipper...they're going to lose one for the flipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice

Remember, 41 embarassed Dan during the '88 campaign? My fuzzy memory is that Dan tried to embarass 41 over an incident, and 41 turned it around on him, asking how he'd like it if his entire career were judged by the 6 or 7 minutes when Dan walked off the show in a tiff.

Not that Rather ever liked Bush, but that was an awful moment for him and really was one of the turning points in the '88 election.


139 posted on 09/16/2004 8:57:50 AM PDT by EDINVA (a FReeper in PJ's beats a CBS anchor in a suit every time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice

Didn't GHWB give an interview with Rather that turned out really bad, back when GHWB was running for president? GHWB smacked him down on-air or something?


140 posted on 09/16/2004 8:58:01 AM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: pepsionice
From what I've seen John Roberts has no vendetta against the Bush family,

Take another look. John Roberts definitely is right up there with Rather when it comes to buying this fantasy they're trying to spin.

Whether it's against the "Bush family" or just George W. Bush, Roberts is not fair or evenhanded when it comes to the National Guard story.

I often hark back to that outrageous press briefing back in February over this issue. The reporters behaved like snarling wild hyenas, and John Roberts led the pack. It is beyond all reason and real evidence. They just want this story to be true so they act as if it is.

167 posted on 09/16/2004 9:07:21 AM PDT by cyncooper (It's rattlesnake season. Have you seen a rattlesnake lately?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson