Replies

"This is 2004 and Kerry is the challenger. "

Really. Well, you must be right. Ok then. I guess Bill and Hillary have been HELPING Kerry all this time, right? They're loyal to the party, hate Bush, right?

But, honestly, I guess I'm a bit slow to see how they are helping. But I guess I'm too slow anyway to figure it out. Oh well. Thank you for bringing clarity to the matter of Kerry's "challenge".

Really. Well, you must be right. Ok then. I guess Bill and Hillary have been HELPING Kerry all this time, right? They're loyal to the party, hate Bush, right?

This isn't zero-sum.
Their lack of help doesn't prove the opposite.
And their hands are not in all things at all times.

The Clintons were never good at scandals. They got caught every time. The only thing they were good at is escaping punishment, but that's only because of their friends who protected them to their own detriment.

A setup this elaborate, this meticulously planned and executed is far beyond these bumbling Arkanas bumpkins.

And as far as their 'help' or lack thereof, it's hard to tell the difference between the Clintons' legitimate 'help' and sabotage these days.
Remember McBride in Florida?
Remember all the other Demcrats they campaigned for in 2002?
Their 'help' did more harm than good for the Democrats.

The best help the Clintons could give is to stay far, far away, and that is what they've been doing.