[robertpaulsen]

tacticalogic makes the case in his post #465 that Soares was elected because the DemocRATS voted against the anti-abortion candidate.

Why don't the two of you come to a consensus and get back to me?

[tacticalogic]

I think we can all agree that you will say and do pretty much anything you think will keep pot illegal, including misrepresenting anything I or William have to say about it.

[William Terrell]

Why should there be any consensus, and what would that mean to you? This has nothing to do with the claims of the article nor it being further evidence that the societal vector on drugs is pointed away from your position.

Since you use the notion that the majority supports the war on drugs, and prohibition of cannabis in particular, thereby giving it validity, would you abandon that position should the majority turn against the war on drugs, and prohibition of cannabis?