[steve-b]

If this were the case, the extremely liberal NY judiciary would have thrown them out on Constitutional grounds long ago.

Let the record show that "wideawake" believes that gun confiscation is perfectly Constitutional.

[wideawake]

Let the record show that "wideawake" believes that gun confiscation is perfectly Constitutional.

You jump to an unwarranted conclusion to score a cheap debating point.

The unconstitutional firearms laws of the state of NY are in place precisely because the NY judiciary is liberal.

My point was that liberals despise drug laws and if they could find any constitutional grounds for eliminating the Rockefeller laws they would do so in a heartbeat.

The fact that the judiciary is hostile to the laws and continually complains about them and is yet unable to find constitutional grounds for their repeal empirically demonstrates their constitutionality.

The NY judiciary, being liberal, hates firearms possession and would never review the constitutionality of NY's unconstitutional gun laws.

[robertpaulsen]

"Let the record show that "wideawake" believes that gun confiscation is perfectly Constitutional"

Let the record show that steve-b thinks the second amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects the rights of New York citizens to keep and bear arms.